Stokes v. Ford Motor Co.
| Docket Number | DA 11-0713 |
| Decision Date | 12 February 2013 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology
Start Your 7-day Trial
5 cases
-
Mont. State Univ.-Bozeman v. Mont. First Judicial Dist. Court
...practice during pendency of disputed unemployment insurance claim); Stokes v. Ford Motor Co. (Stokes II ) , 2013 MT 29, ¶¶ 19-20, 368 Mont. 365, 300 P.3d 648 (affirming denial of default judgment on liability where untimely dump of 300 GB of requested other similar incidents information thr......
-
S & P Brake Supply, Inc. v. STEMCO LP
...has broad discretion in determining whether evidence is relevant and admissible. Stokes v. Ford Motor Co. , 2013 MT 29, ¶ 11, 368 Mont. 365, 300 P.3d 648. We thus review evidentiary rulings for an abuse of discretion. Stokes , ¶ 11. ¶14 We review for correctness a district court's determina......
-
Spotted Horse v. BNSF Ry. Co.
...“willfully and in bad faith shield[ing] Schuff from a clear view of the truth”); cf. Stokes v. Ford Motor Co., 2013 MT 29, ¶ 20, 368 Mont. 365, 300 P.3d 648 (given that there was no wanton disregard of court orders or an intention to “slow down discovery,” district court did not abuse its d......
-
Litwin v. O.T. Mining Corp.
...with court orders enforcing the rules, or in flagrant disregard of those rules. Stokes v. Ford Motor Co. , 2013 MT 29, ¶ 18, 368 Mont. 365, 300 P.3d 648. The party requesting a default judgment must show prejudice. Stokes , ¶ 18.¶14 Here, undermining its theory that default judgment stemmed......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
The Exclusion of Other Incident Evidence in Product Liability Litigation
...concluded that the seven prior incidents along with the accompanying expert testimony were properly excluded. Finally, Stokes v. Ford Motor Co., 300 P.3d 648 (Mont. 2013), is a significant case because it demonstrates that the foundational requirement of substantial similarity can serve as ......