STOKES V. STOKES

Docket NumberNo. CV-15-557
Decision Date28 April 2016

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
19 cases
  • Williams v. Baptist Health
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • April 23, 2020
    ...issues of material fact exist requiring litigation and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Stokes v. Stokes , 2016 Ark. 182, 491 S.W.3d 113. Once the moving party has established a prima facie entitlement to summary judgment, the opposing party must meet proof ......
  • Tilley v. Malvern Nat'l Bank
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • December 7, 2017
    ...all justiciable matters not assigned elsewhere, and it has the power to grant all remedies to the parties before it." 2016 Ark. 182, 5 n.3, 491 S.W.3d 113, 118 n.3 (emphasis added). We take this opportunity to clarify that after the enactment of amendment 80, the clean-up doctrine was aboli......
  • Faughn v. Kennedy
    • United States
    • Arkansas Court of Appeals
    • December 4, 2019
    ...our supreme court has looked to the "complaint as a whole" to determine the true nature of the action. See generally , Stokes v. Stokes , 2016 Ark. 182, 491 S.W.3d 113 ; Bristol-Meyers Squibb Co. v. Saline Cty. Circ. Ct. , 329 Ark. 357, 947 S.W.3d 12. Here, even though the Kennedys did not ......
  • Roberts v. Unimin Corp.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Arkansas
    • December 5, 2016
    ...precludes an award of attorney's fees, unless a statute or contractual agreement provides for such an award. Stokes v. Stokes, 2016 Ark. 182, 10, 491 S.W.3d 113, 120. Unimin asks this Court to award attorney's fees pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. § 16-22-308, which provides:In any civil action t......
  • Get Started for Free