STOKES V. STOKES
Docket Number | No. CV-15-557 |
Decision Date | 28 April 2016 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
18 cases
-
Williams v. Baptist Health
...issues of material fact exist requiring litigation and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Stokes v. Stokes , 2016 Ark. 182, 491 S.W.3d 113. Once the moving party has established a prima facie entitlement to summary judgment, the opposing party must meet proof ......
-
Tilley v. Malvern Nat'l Bank
...all justiciable matters not assigned elsewhere, and it has the power to grant all remedies to the parties before it." 2016 Ark. 182, 5 n.3, 491 S.W.3d 113, 118 n.3 (emphasis added). We take this opportunity to clarify that after the enactment of amendment 80, the clean-up doctrine was aboli......
-
Faughn v. Kennedy
...our supreme court has looked to the "complaint as a whole" to determine the true nature of the action. See generally , Stokes v. Stokes , 2016 Ark. 182, 491 S.W.3d 113 ; Bristol-Meyers Squibb Co. v. Saline Cty. Circ. Ct. , 329 Ark. 357, 947 S.W.3d 12. Here, even though the Kennedys did not ......
-
Roberts v. Unimin Corp.
...precludes an award of attorney's fees, unless a statute or contractual agreement provides for such an award. Stokes v. Stokes, 2016 Ark. 182, 10, 491 S.W.3d 113, 120. Unimin asks this Court to award attorney's fees pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. § 16-22-308, which provides:In any civil action t......
Request a trial to view additional results