Stone v. USD NO. 222, 90,317.
Decision Date | 25 June 2004 |
Docket Number | No. 90,317.,90,317. |
Citation | 278 Kan. 166,91 P.3d 1194 |
Parties | GARY STONE and DANIELLE STONE, Plaintiffs/Appellees, v. U.S.D. No. 222, Defendant/Appellant, and GARY HADDAN, d/b/a HADDAN WRECKER & EXCAVATING, Defendant. |
Court | Kansas Supreme Court |
Teresa L. Sittenauer, of Fisher, Patterson, Sayler & Smith, L.L.P., of Topeka, argued the cause, and David R. Cooper, of the same firm, was with her on the briefs for appellant U.S.D. No. 222.
Jason E. Brinegar, of Galloway, Wiegers & Heeney, P.A., of Marysville, argued the cause and was on the briefs for appellees Gary and Danielle Stone.
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Burlington Northern Railroad Company (railroad) conveyed property to U.S.D. No. 222 (school district). The adjacent landowners Gary and Danielle Stone (Stones) were granted partial summary judgment based upon the trial court's ruling that the land reverted to the Stones when its use for a right-of-way was abandoned. The trial court concluded that notwithstanding the railroad's fee simple interest by original deed, the land was used for a right-of-way limiting the railroad's interest to a right-of-way easement only. The Court of Appeals affirmed in Stone v. U.S.D. No. 222, 31 Kan. App. 2d 1063, 77 P.3d 509 (2003). We granted the school district's petition for review, and reverse and remand with directions.
On November 7, 1883, Hugh and E.J. Little conveyed real estate in Washington County, Kansas, to The Chicago, Iowa & Kansas Railroad Company by warranty deed recorded on December 4, 1883:
Six months later, by deed dated May 16, 1884, The Chicago, Iowa & Kansas Railroad Company conveyed a portion of this real estate to F.M. Cox and W.H. Emery:
"This deed is intended to convey to the said F.M. Cox and W.H. Emery all the land lying south of a line drawn fifty (50) feet south of, and parallel with, the railroad of the said Chicago, Iowa & Kansas Railroad Company; said land having been conveyed to said Railroad Company by a deed from Hugh Little and wife, dated November 7th 1983, and recorded December 7, 1883 . . . ."
The deed described the property as follows:
"Commencing at a point twenty (20) rods north of the southeast corner of the northeast quarter of Section two (2), in Township three (3) South, Range three (3) East of the Sixth (6th) principal meridian; thence west two hundred and thirty-five (235) feet; thence north one hundred and thirty (130) feet; thence north sixty-seven (67) degrees east magnetic for two hundred and forty (240) feet; thence south one hundred and eighty-one (181) feet to place of beginning; and also the small brick house now standing on the right of way immediately north of the above described tract."
After the conveyance to Cox and Emery, the railroad owned a trapezoid-shaped piece of land measuring 117.5 feet on the west, 235 feet on the north, 66.5 feet on the east, and 240 feet along the south border (subject property). Upon this subject property the railroad laid tracks and the property was used for well over 100 years as its right-of-way. Although the deeds are not in the record on appeal, we note that the district court found that surrounding landowners granted the railroad right-of-ways in their land in 1883 and 1884. The railroad line was eventually abandoned, but when this occurred is not clear from the record.
The Chicago, Iowa & Kansas Railroad Company's successor in interest, the Burlington Northern Railroad Company, conveyed the subject property to the school district by quitclaim deed dated February 25, 1986, recorded on March 14, 1986, which described the land as:
"All that portion of Burlington Northern Railroad Company's right-of-way and station ground property at Washington, Kansas on the Odell, Nebraska to Concordia, Kansas Branch Line right-of-way August 15, 2003, now discontinued, varying in width on each side of the main track centerline, as originally located and constructed upon, over and across a part of the S ½ of the NE ½ of Section 2, Township 3 South, Range 3 East, lying Easterly of the West line of `E' Street in the Town of Washington, Washington County, Kansas."
During the spring and summer of 2001, the school district directed defendant Gary Haddan, d/b/a/ Haddan Wrecker & Excavating (Haddan), to secure fill dirt from the subject property to backfill a hole left when a school was razed. As adjacent landowners to the subject property, the Stones filed a petition for damages based on trespass against the school district and Haddan. The Stones claimed the removal of this dirt damaged the remainder of their property by removing valuable vegetation, altering the flow of rain water, causing flooding and channel formation, and soot and dirt relocation, which has reduced the value of their property.
Both parties filed motions for partial summary judgment on the issue of ownership of the subject property. The Stones argued that the subject property reverted to them because the railroad had only obtained a right-of-way that had been since abandoned. The school district argued that the subject property did not revert to the Stones because the railroad held the subject property in fee simple absolute and conveyed it to the school district by quitclaim deed.
Ruling in favor of the Stones, the district court found that the deeds in the chain of title showed that the property was acquired by the predecessor railroad for railroad purposes (construction and maintenance), and that the railroad held a right-of-way only because of the use for which the property was acquired. Thus, the property reverted to the Stones as the adjoining landowners on abandonment of the right-of-way. The school district filed a timely interlocutory appeal and the Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling.
On petition for review, the school district argues the Court of Appeals erred in affirming the district court's order granting partial summary judgment in favor of the Stones. The school district argues the railroad was granted fee simple title in the original warranty deed and the railroad conveyed the same to the school district. The Stones argue that the railroad only had an easement in the subject property which was used as a railroad right-of-way, and the property reverted to them as adjacent landowners upon abandonment.
The question we must answer is whether the railroad's interest in the subject property was limited to a right-of-way or if it was a fee simple absolute interest. The answer to the question lies in Kansas statutory law and the past appellate decisions of Kansas. After identifying the governing statute, we will review those key past appellate decisions bearing upon the question. We will then discuss the Court of Appeals' resolution of the question. Finally, we will resolve the question presented.
A railroad may acquire an interest in real property by eminent domain, by purchase, or by voluntary grant. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. Humberg, 9 Kan. App. 2d 205, 207, 675 P.2d 375 (1984). K.S.A. 66-501 provides that every railway corporation has the power:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Arnold v. United States
...To determine whether a deed conveyed land to a railroad as a right-of-way, Kansas courts first look to the deed itself. Stone v. Haddan, 91 P.3d 1194, 1203-04 (Kan. 2004). Kansas law holds that, in construing a deed, the first step is to determine whether the deed is ambiguous. Cent. Natura......
-
Myers v. Board of County Com'Rs of Jackson County
...court reviews the district court's grant of summary judgment as a question of law subject to de novo review. Stone v. U.S.D. No. 222, 278 Kan. 166, 178, 91 P.3d 1194 (2004). Resolution of this issue requires this court to interpret K.S.A.2004 Supp. 12-105b(d). Interpretation of a statute is......
-
Biery v. U.S., 07-693L
...Kansas law, the interest conveyed to a railroad by a voluntary grant depends on the interpretation of the deed. Stone v. U.S.D. No. 222, 91 P.3d 1194, 1203-04 (Kan. 2004). The Chase deed at issue in Pankratz states the conveyance was "for the purpose of constructing and operating said Railw......
-
Biery v. U.S., 07-693L
...Kansas law, the interest conveyed to a railroad by a voluntary grant depends on the interpretation of the deed. Stone v. U.S.D. No. 222, 91 P.3d 1194, 1203-04 (Kan. 2004). The Chase deed at issue in Pankratz states the conveyance was "for the purpose of constructing and operating said Railw......
-
CHAPTER 14 MINERAL TITLE UNDER WATER BODIES, RAILROADS, STREETS, AND HIGHWAYS
...Co. v. Ethington Family Trust, 50 P.3d 450 (Idaho 2002). [94] 6 A.L.R.3d 973 (2010), at 26. [95] Id at 27, citing Stone v. U.S.D. No. 222, 91 P.3d 1194 (Kan. 2004); Schoenberger v. Missouri Pacific R.R. Co., 26 P.3d 700 (Kan. Ct. App. 2000). [96] 6 A.L.R.3d 973 (2010), at 28. [97] Id. at 30......
-
CHAPTER 8 MINERAL TITLE UNDER WATER BODIES, RAILROADS, STREETS AND HIGHWAYS
...v. Ethington Family Trust, 50 P.3d 450 (Idaho 2002). [84] 6 A.L.R.3d 973 (2010), at 26. [85] Id. at 27, citing Stone v. U.S.D. No. 222, 91 P.3d 1194 (Kan. 2004); Schoenberger v. Missouri Pacific R.R Co., 26 P.3d 700 (Kan. Ct. App. 2000). [86] 6 A.L.R.3d 973 (2010), at 28. [87] Id. at 30, ci......
-
MINERAL OWNERSHIP UNDER RAILROADS, STREETS AND ALLEYWAYS
...Co. v. Ethington Family Trust, 50 P.3d 450 (Idaho 2002).[88] 6 A.L.R.3d 973 (2010), at 26.[89] Id at 27, citing Stone v. U.S.D. No. 222, 91 P.3d 1194 (Kan. 2004); Schoenberger v. Missouri Pacific R.R. Co., 26 P.3d 700 (Kan. Ct. App. 2000).[90] 6 A.L.R.3d 973 (2010), at 28.[91] Id. at 30, ci......
-
LEGAL DEVELOPMENTS IN 2014 AFFECTING THE OIL AND GAS EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION INDUSTRY
...(1905) (use as a right-of-way was "within the contemplation of the parties" because of the language used). [67] Stone v. U.S.D. No. 222, 91 P.3d 1194, 1198-99 (Kan. 2004) (quoting Abercrombie v. Simmons). [68] 309 P.3d 1 (Kan. Ct. App. 2013). [69] 339 P.3d 392 (Kan. Ct. App. Sept. 10, 2014)......