Storfer v. Fogel

Decision Date05 October 1964
PartiesSarah STORFER, Appellant, v. Jack FOGEL, Respondent.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Stanley J. Glantz, Brooklyn, for appellant.

Raymond J. MacDonnell, New York City, for respondent; Philip Hoffer, New York City, of counsel.

In a negligence action to recover damages for injury to person and property, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated May 4, 1964, which denied her motion for summary judgment (CPLR Rule 3212). Order affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, the record presents issues of fact which should be resolved after a trial (Kind v. Barone, 12 A.D.2d 625, 208 N.Y.S.2d 147; Hilton v. Feinerman, 11 A.D.2d 1027, 207 N.Y.S.2d 956).

BELDOCK, P. J., and KLEINFELD, CHRIST, HILL and RABIN, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT