Storms Realty Co., Inc. v. New Amsterdam Cas. Co., 173.
Decision Date | 28 April 1933 |
Docket Number | No. 173.,173. |
Citation | 166 A. 162 |
Parties | STORMS REALTY CO., Inc. v. NEW AMSTERDAM CASUALTY CO. |
Court | New Jersey Supreme Court |
Syllabus by the Court.
The record, in this case as examined, does not indicate that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.
Appeal from Supreme Court.
Action by the Storms Realty Company, Inc., etc., against the New Amsterdam Casualty Company. From an adverse judgment, plaintiff appeals.
Reversed.
Lightdale & Lightdale, of Jersey City (Harold B. Lightdale, of Jersey City, of counsel), for appellant.
Joseph C. Paul, of Newark, for appellee.
The plaintiff sued to recover under a policy of insurance. The instrument is lengthy but contains, among others, the following provisions:
The complaint alleges that during the life of the policy, "one Gussie Katzel was in and upon the building known as 399-403 Avenue 'C', Bayonne, New Jersey, mentioned and described in said policy of insurance, which said building was then and there owned and maintained by the plaintiff corporation, the assured named and described in said policy of insurance, when due to the negligence of the plaintiff corporation in the maintenance of said...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Prudential Property & Cas. Ins. Co. v. Boylan
...policy provisions, The Ohio Cas. Ins. Co. v. Flanagin, 44 N.J. 504, 512, 210 A.2d 221 (1965); Storms Realty Co., Inc. v. New Amsterdam Cas. Co., 110 N.J.L. 538, 540, 166 A. 162 (E. & A.1933), are essentially negligence based, including negligent supervision. See, e.g., Property Cas. Co. of ......