Stovall v. Miller, 10–851.
| Decision Date | 14 November 2011 |
| Docket Number | No. 10–851.,10–851. |
| Parties | Clarice STOVALL, Warden, petitioner, v. Sharee MILLER. |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Opinion
On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for further consideration in light of Greene v. Fisher, 565 U.S. ––––, 132 S.Ct. 38, ––– L.Ed.2d –––– (2011).
To continue reading
Request your trial
5 cases
-
United States v. Thurman, Criminal Action No. 3:10CR107–H.
...be available for use later at trial. Id. See, Miller v. Stovall, 608 F.3d 913, 923 (6th Cir.), petition for cert. filed––– U.S. ––––, 132 S.Ct. 573, 181 L.Ed.2d 418 (2011) (discussing Crawford ). Robinson and Thurman seize on the third and final category of statements to support their argum......
- People v. McFee
-
Miller v. Stovall
...leading to Miller's petition was thoroughly recited in Miller v. Stovall, 608 F.3d 913, 915-18 (6th Cir. 2010), vacated, Stovall v. Miller, 132 S.Ct. 573 (2011) (mem.). Thus, a brief history will do. On December 22, 2000 Miller was convicted in state court of second-degreemurder and conspir......
-
United States v. Butts
...299–301 (6th Cir. 2012) ; Miller v. Stovall , 608 F.3d 913, 927 (6th Cir. 2010), vacated on other grounds by Stovall v. Miller , 565 U.S. 1031, 132 S.Ct. 573, 181 L.Ed.2d 418 (2011). Justifying the exercise of this discretion is the benefit of avoiding futile proceedings in the district cou......
Request a trial to view additional results