Stradley v. Andersen, 71-1363.

Decision Date29 February 1972
Docket NumberNo. 71-1363.,71-1363.
Citation456 F.2d 1063
PartiesLarry STRADLEY, Appellant, v. Richard R. ANDERSEN, as Chief of the Division of Police, Department of Public Safety, City of Omaha, Nebraska, Appellee.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit

Bennett G. Hornstein, Stanley A. Krieger, Bruce G. Mason, Omaha, Neb., for appellant.

James E. Fellows, Kent N. Whinnery, Omaha, Neb., for appellee.

Before MATTHES, Chief Judge, and LAY and ROSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff-appellant brought this suit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging deprivation of his constitutional rights by the order of his employer, the Omaha Police Division, governing the length and style of hair and mustaches of Omaha police officers. The district court, Judge Denney, after hearing the evidence of the parties, dismissed the complaint for failure to exhaust administrative remedies through union contract and statutory grievance procedures, and for reasons of comity inhering in the abstention doctrine. Stradley v. Andersen, 334 F.Supp. 72 (D.Neb.1971).

In this case, however, the "right alleged is . . . plainly federal in origin and nature, . . . no underlying issue of state law is controlling, . . . nor is the federal right in any way entangled in a skein of state law that must be untangled before the federal case can proceed." McNeese v. Board of Educ., 373 U.S. 668, 674, 83 S.Ct. 1433, 1437, 10 L.Ed.2d 622 (1963). The law is well-settled that in such cases the very purpose of § 1983 precludes forcing a forum choice on the plaintiff by requiring exhaustion of the state's avenues of litigation. Wilwording v. Swenson, 404 U.S. 249, 92 S.Ct. 407, 409-410, 30 L. Ed.2d 418 (1971); Houghton v. Shafer, 392 U.S. 639, 88 S.Ct. 2119, 20 L.Ed.2d 1319 (1968); Damico v. California, 389 U.S. 416, 88 S.Ct. 526, 19 L.Ed.2d 647 (1967); McNeese v. Board of Educ., supra; Monroe v. Pape, 365 U.S. 167, 81 S.Ct. 473, 5 L.Ed.2d 492 (1961). The same reasoning makes it improper to abstain in this case. Wisconsin v. Constantineau, 400 U.S. 433, 439, 91 S.Ct. 507, 27 L.Ed.2d 515 (1971). The special circumstances attendant to enjoining a state prosecution are not present here and thus the district court's reliance on Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 91 S.Ct. 746, 27 L.Ed.2d 669 (1971) is misplaced.

Reversed and remanded for a trial on the merits.

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • Webb v. Lake Mills Community School District
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Iowa
    • 26 Mayo 1972
    ...under 42 U.S.C., Section 1983. Wisconsin v. Constantineau, 400 U.S. 433, 439, 91 S.Ct. 507, 27 L.Ed.2d 515 (1971); Stradley v. Anderson, 456 F.2d 1063 (8th Cir. 1972). Defendant Lake Mills Community School District asserts that the Court does not have subject matter jurisdiction to grant re......
  • Sugar v. CURTIS CIRCULATION COMPANY
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • 17 Junio 1974
    ...Pape, 365 U.S. 167, 183, 81 S.Ct. 473, 5 L.Ed.2d 492 (1961); Conover v. Montemuro, 477 F.2d 1073, 1079 (3d Cir. 1972); Stradley v. Andersen, 456 F.2d 1063 (8th Cir. 1972). As the Court stated in Monroe v. Pape, supra, at "It is no answer that the State has a law which if enforced would give......
  • Concerned Consumers League v. O'NEILL, Civ. A. No. 71-C-601.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Wisconsin
    • 25 Febrero 1974
    ...373 U.S. 668, 83 S.Ct. 1433, 10 L.Ed.2d 622 (1963); Monroe v. Pape, 365 U.S. 167, 81 S.Ct. 473, 5 L.Ed.2d 492 (1961); Stradley v. Andersen, 456 F.2d 1063 (8th Cir. 1972). Nor is this court restricted from enjoining the enforcement of a state court's injunction by the federal "anti-injunctio......
  • Simpson v. Weeks
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • 18 Enero 1978
    ...(1974); Wolder v. Rahm, 549 F.2d 543, 544 (8th Cir. 1977); Gilliam v. City of Omaha, 459 F.2d 63 (8th Cir. 1972); Stradley v. Andersen, 456 F.2d 1063, 1064 (8th Cir. 1972). See also K. Davis, Administrative Law of the Seventies § 20.01-1, at 452 (1976). Free Speech. Defendants next assert t......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT