Strauss v. Horton
Decision Date | 26 May 2009 |
Docket Number | No. S168047.,No. S168078.,No. S168066.,S168047.,S168066.,S168078. |
Citation | 207 P.3d 48,93 Cal.Rptr.3d 591 |
Court | California Supreme Court |
Parties | Karen L. STRAUSS et al., Petitioners, v. Mark B. HORTON, as State Registrar of Vital Statistics, etc., et al., Respondents; Dennis Hollingsworth et al., Interveners. Robin Tyler et al., Petitioners, v. The State of California et al., Respondents; Dennis Hollingsworth et al., Interveners. City and County of San Francisco et al., Petitioners, v. Mark B. Horton, as State Registrar of Vital Statistics, etc., et al., Respondents; Dennis Hollingsworth et al., Interveners. |
To continue reading
Request your trial64 cases
-
McHugh v. Protective Life Ins. Co.
... ... (See, e.g., Quarry , supra , 53 Cal.4th at p. 956, 139 Cal.Rptr.3d 3, 272 P.3d 977 ; Strauss v. Horton (2009) 46 Cal.4th 364, 472, 93 Cal.Rptr.3d 591, 207 P.3d 48 ; Elsner v. Uveges (2004) 34 Cal.4th 915, 937, 22 Cal.Rptr.3d 530, 102 P.3d ... ...
-
Stevens v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.
... ... due process clause[ ] with respect to the subject matter encompassed by the new provision. 14 ( Strauss v. Horton (2009) 46 Cal.4th 364, 407, 93 Cal.Rptr.3d 591, 207 P.3d 48.) By giving the Legislature plenary powers over the workers' compensation ... ...
-
Chula Vista Citizens for Jobs & Fair Competition v. Norris
... ... Manheim & Howard, supra, at 1184 (footnotes and paragraph break omitted). See also Strauss v. Horton, [46 Cal.4th 364, 93 Cal.Rptr.3d 591] 207 P.3d 48, 84 ([]2009). The initiative system was designed as an antidote to this capture of the ... ...
-
Protectmarriage.com-Yes On 8, Renewal v. City of Montgomery
... ... Thus, the only precedential appellate decision addressing the merits of Proposition 8 is the California Supreme Court's opinion in Strauss v. Horton, 46 Cal.4th 364, 93 Cal.Rptr.3d 591, 207 P.3d 48 (2009), which held that challenges to Proposition 8 “lack[ed] merit” under California ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results
7 books & journal articles
-
Equal Protection
...state equal protection clause. 416 The court further declined to follow the decisions of the highest courts 405. See Strauss v. Horton, 207 P.3d 48, 59 (Cal. 2009). In Strauss v. Horton , the California Supreme Court confirmed that Proposition 8 overruled In Re Marriage Cases by carving ou......
-
Barriers, Hurdles, and Discrimination: The Current Status of LGBT Intercountry Adoption and Why Changes Must Be Made to Effectuate the Best Interests of the Child
...Id. California recognizes same-sex marriages that were performed between May 15, 2008 and November 4, 2008. See Strauss v. Horton, 207 P.3d 48, 119 (Cal. 2009). 32 See infra Part V. 33 See infra Part V.E. 34 As used in this article, the term ―sending country‖ refers to the country of the ch......
-
The Court of Appeals's decision in Godfrey v. Spano: a troubling exercise of indecision.
...ban); see also In re Marriage Cases, 183 P.3d 384, 399 (Cal. 2008) (striking down same-sex marriage ban), superseded by Strauss v. Horton, 207 P.3d 48, 59 (Cal. 2009) (upholding Proposition 8, which prohibits marriages by same-sex couples, but holding prior marriages remain valid). The city......
-
MARRIAGE EQUALITY'S LESSONS FOR SOCIAL MOVEMENTS AND CONSTITUTIONAL CHANGE.
...(https://perma.cc/5GP9-NFHL]. Proposition 8 terminated that process, see Strauss v. Horton, 207 P.3d 48, 59 (Cal. 2009), until it was invalidated and appeals exhausted on June 26, 2013, Hollingsworth v. Perry, 570 U.S. 693, 715 (47.) See Bonauto, supra note 10, at 66. (48.) Fig. 3. (49.) Ju......
Request a trial to view additional results