Strawberry Hill Press, Inc. v. Scanlon, Civ. No. 19257.

Decision Date10 March 1959
Docket NumberCiv. No. 19257.
Citation172 F. Supp. 335
PartiesSTRAWBERRY HILL PRESS, INC., Plaintiff, v. Thomas E. SCANLON, District Director of Internal Revenue for the District of Brooklyn, Defendant.
CourtU.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York

O'Brien, Driscoll & Raftery, New York City, for plaintiff, Edmund C. Grainger, Jr., New York City, of counsel.

Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., Richard M. Roberts, Frank W. Rogers, Jr., Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., Cornelius W. Wickersham, Jr., U. S. Atty., Eastern Dist. of New York, Brooklyn, N. Y., for defendant, Irwin J. Harrison, Asst. U. S. Atty., Great Neck, N. Y., of counsel.

BRUCHHAUSEN, District Judge.

This is an action in which plaintiff seeks to enjoin defendant from enforcing collection of a penalty assessed by defendant for late filing of a federal corporate income tax return. Defendant now moves to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A.

The facts are not in dispute. Taxpayer filed a delinquent tax return for the fiscal year ending April 30, 1958. No request for extension had been made and no explanation of delinquency offered.

Pursuant to Section 6651 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, 26 U.S.C.A. § 6651 a delinquency penalty of $3,003.79 was imposed on August 29, 1958 and notice and demand mailed to the taxpayer. A protest of the penalty was filed on November 18, 1958 and plaintiff filed the complaint in this case on December 5, 1958.

Suits to restrain assessment or collection of taxes may not ordinarily be maintained in any court. However, Section 6213 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, 26 U.S.C.A. § 6213 provides for certain procedures with respect to deficiencies which allow a taxpayer an opportunity for notice and a hearing in the Tax Court. This section also provides that if these procedures are not complied with then actions taken to secure payment of the tax may be enjoined by a proceeding in the proper court.

The sole issue is whether a penalty for delinquent filing of a tax return is such a deficiency as to be included under Section 6213. It appears that penalties for delinquent filing are such deficiencies.

The section under consideration reads as follows:

"§ 6659. Applicable rules
"(a) Additions treated as tax.— Except as otherwise provided in this title—
"(1) The additions to the tax, additional amounts, and penalties provided by this chapter shall be paid upon notice and demand and shall be assessed, collected, and paid in the same manner as taxes;
"(2) Any reference in this title to `tax' imposed by this title shall be deemed also to refer to the additions to the tax, additional amounts, and penalties provided by this chapter.
"(b) Additions to tax for failure to file return or pay tax.—Any addition under section 6651 or section 6653 to a tax imposed by another subtitle of this title shall be considered a part of such tax for the purpose of applying the provisions of this title relating to the assessment and collection of such tax (including the provisions of subchapter B of chapter 63, relating to deficiency procedures for income, estate, and gift taxes)."

The language of the statute seems to be explicit that additions to the tax, including penalties, are to be assessed and collected in the same manner as the tax to which they are added. The wording of Section 6659(a) (1) and (b) seems to state precisely that penalties in general and specifically penalties under Section 6651 are subject to the same procedures for collection as taxes. Therefore notice and the opportunity of a hearing in the Tax Court must be available for penalties as well as for deficiencies.

The language of Section 6659 differs from its predecessor statute Section 291 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, 26 U.S.C.A. § 291 which provides for delinquency penalties as follows:

"(a) * * * The (delinquency penalty) amount so added to any tax shall be collected at the same time and in the same manner and as a part of the tax unless the tax has been paid before the discovery of the neglect, in which case

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • DiRezza v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue (In re Estate of DiRezza)
    • United States
    • U.S. Tax Court
    • January 11, 1982
    ...591), 83d Cong., 2d Sess. A420 (1954). However, in Granquist v. Hackleman, 264 F.2d 9 (9th Cir. 1959), and Strawberry Hill Press, Inc. v. Scanlon, 172 F. Supp. 335 (E.D. N.Y. 1959), affd. per curiam 273 F.2d 306 (2d Cir. 1959), the courts held that under the 1954 Code all additions to tax f......
  • Lipsig v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • July 27, 1960
    ...548. In support of his claim plaintiff argues that Davis v. Dudley, D.C.Pa. 1954, 124 F.Supp. 426, and Strawberry Hill Press, Inc. v. Scanlon, D.C.N.Y.1959, 172 F.Supp. 335, affirmed 2 Cir., 273 F.2d 306, are controlling. Those cases however held that a penalty would be treated as a deficie......
  • VIRGIN ISLANDS HOUSING & URA v. 19.0976 Acres of Land, Civ. No. 110-1958.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Virgin Islands
    • April 17, 1959
  • Strawberry Hill Press, Inc. v. Scanlon, 206
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • December 22, 1959
    ...opinion by Judge Bruchhausen, upon motion of the District Director to dismiss the complaint, is reported at Strawberry Hill Press, Inc., v. Scanlon, D.C.E.D.N.Y.1959, 172 F.Supp. 335. ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT