Strawbridge Et Al v. Curtiss Et Al
Decision Date | 01 February 1806 |
Citation | 2 L.Ed. 435,3 Cranch 267,7 U.S. 267 |
Parties | STRAWBRIDGE ET AL. v. CURTISS ET AL |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
THIS was an appeal from a decree of the circuit court, for the district of Massachusetts, which dismissed the complainants' bill in chancery, for want of jurisdiction.
Some of the complainants were alleged to be citizens of the state of Massachusetts. The defendants were also stated to be citizens of the same state, excepting Curtiss, who was averred to be a citizen of the state of Vermont, and upon whom the subpoena was served in that state.
The question of jurisdiction was submitted to the court without argument, by P. B. Key, for the appellants, and Harper, for the appellees.
On a subsequent day,
The court has considered this case, and is of opinion that the jurisdiction cannot be supported.
The words of the act of congress are, 'where an alien is a party; or the suit is between a citizen of a state where the suit is brought, and a citizen of another state.'
The court understands these expressions to mean that each distinct interest should be represented by persons, all of...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
In re Hanford Nuclear Reservation Litigation
...as this statute has long been interpreted as requiring complete diversity between opposing parties. Strawbridge v. Curtiss, 7 U.S. (3 Cranch) 267, 2 L.Ed. 435 (1806). Further, while it is generally the rule that "a plaintiff who has a state common law action that also falls within another s......
-
Bessinger v. Food Lion, Inc.
...diversity jurisdiction to only those cases where no shared citizenship exists between the adverse parties. Strawbridge v. Curtiss, 7 U.S. (3 Cranch) 267, 2 L.Ed. 435 (1806). If a party not diverse to the plaintiff has been joined as a defendant prior to the removal, the complete diversity r......
-
Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. Distajo
...defendant. C.T. Carden v. Arkoma Assocs., 494 U.S. 185, 187, 110 S.Ct. 1015, 1017, 108 L.Ed.2d 157 (1990); Strawbridge v. Curtiss, 7 U.S. (3 Cranch) 267, 267, 2 L.Ed. 435 (1806), overruled on other grounds, 43 U.S. (2 How.) 497, 555, 11 L.Ed. 353 (1844); Curley v. Brignoli, Curley & Roberts......
-
Lenz v. Associated Inns & Restaurants Co. of Am., 90 Civ. 3026 (KC).
...diversity jurisdiction because the requisite complete diversity among defendants and plaintiffs is absent. Strawbridge v. Curtiss, 7 U.S. (3 Cranch) 267, 2 L.Ed. 435 (1806). Defendants point out that the partnership is a named plaintiff and, for diversity purposes, the citizenship of a limi......
-
Chapter Sixteen
...N. Cent. F.S., Inc. v. Brown, 951 F. Supp. 1383, 1394-95 (N.D. Iowa 1996).[2129] . 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a).[2130] . See Strawbridge v. Curtiss, 7 U.S. 267, 267–68 (1806), overruled in part by Louisville, Cincinnati & Charleston R.R. Co. v. Letson, 43 U.S. 497 (1844); see also St. Paul Fire & Ma......
-
Dueling Grants: Reimagining Cafa's Jurisdictional Provisions
...courts "is of ancient lineage, the proposition has never satisfactorily been established by the reme Court"). 275. Strawbridge v. Curtiss, 7 U.S. 267 (1807) (affirming dismissal for lack of diversity jurisdiction, interpreting the Judiciary Act of 1789 to require complete diversity of citiz......
-
Table of Cases
...1999), §37:410 Strauss v. New York Ethical Culture Society , 210 AD2d 134, 620 NYS2d 51 (1st Dept 1994), §28:190 Strawbridge v. Curtiss , 7 US 267 (3 Cranch 1806), §8:471 Strax v. Granoff & Walker , 160 Misc2d 85, 612 NYS2d 291 (1st Dept 1994), §29:83 Stray v. Lutz , 306 AD2d 836, 762 NYS2d......
-
Table of Cases
...1999), §37:410 Strauss v. New York Ethical Culture Society , 210 AD2d 134, 620 NYS2d 51 (1st Dept 1994), §28:190 Strawbridge v. Curtiss , 7 US 267 (3 Cranch 1806), §8:471 Strax v. Granoff & Walker , 160 Misc2d 85, 612 NYS2d 291 (1st Dept 1994), §29:83 Stray v. Lutz , 306 AD2d 836, 762 NYS2d......