Strong v. Moore
| Decision Date | 20 April 1926 |
| Citation | Strong v. Moore, 118 Or. 649, 245 P. 505 (Or. 1926) |
| Parties | STRONG ET AL. v. MOORE ET AL. |
| Court | Oregon Supreme Court |
Department 1.
Appeal from Circuit Court, Multnomah County; George F. Skipworth Judge.
Action by Margaret Strong and others against Ben H. Moore and others. Decree for defendants, and plaintiffs appeal. Affirmed.
Joseph Haney & Littlefield, R. E. Sewall, A. P. Dobson, and Guy C H. Corliss, all of Portland, for respondents.
Afterwards, according to another exhibit attached to the complaint and made a part thereof, the Browns conveyed the property to the Moores, all as appears by the complaint, with the consent of the plaintiff. As part of the same transaction the Moores executed the following document, attached to the complaint as a part thereof, called Exhibit C:
On August 7, 1920, the building on the property was...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Haskin v. Greene
...v. Security Ins. Co., 145 Or. 325, 56 P.2d 1082; Miller v. Gold Beach Packing Co., 131 Or. 302, 282 P. 764, 66 A.L.R. 858; Strong v. Moore, 118 Or. 649, 245 P. 505; Mercer v. Germania Ins. Co., 88 Or. 410, 171 P. 412. As these cases hold, a policy of fire insurance does not run with the lan......
-
Aspinwall v. Ryan
...Or. 609, 610, 87 P. 1046, '* * * agrees to sell, deliver and transfer by good and sufficient warrantee deed * * *'; Strong v. Moore, 118 Or. 649, 650, 653, 245 P. 505, 506, '* * * the owners hereby agree to sell and convey unto the purchaser * * *'. See also 55 Am.Jur., Vendor and Purchaser......
-
Libby Creek Logging, Inc. v. Johnson
...over the allegations as to its legal effect. Kelley et ux. v. Mallory et ux., 202 Or. 690, 697, 277 P.2d 767; Strong et al. v. Moore et al., 118 Or. 649, 245 P. 505; Young v. Evans, 104 Or. 619, 208 P. 741. As the contract on its face did not support the allegation of ambiguity, the objecti......
-
Aldrich v. Forbes
...held that only an option to purchase was created. Herndon v. Armstrong, 148 Or. 602, 36 P.2d 184, 38 P.2d 44 (1934); Strong v. Moore, 118 Or. 649, 245 P. 505 (1926); Scott v. Merrill's Estate, 74 Or. 568, 146 P. 99 (1915).3 Leaving aside the effect of the condition the agreement in the case......