Struyk v. Samuel Braen's Sons, A--119
Citation | 9 N.J. 294,88 A.2d 201 |
Decision Date | 05 May 1952 |
Docket Number | No. A--119,A--119 |
Parties | Neil STRUYK, Building Inspector of the Borough of North Haledon, plaintiff-respondent, v. SAMUEL BRAEN'S SONS, defendant-appellant. |
Court | United States State Supreme Court (New Jersey) |
On appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court, Appellate Division, whose opinion is reported at 17 N.J.Super. 1, 85 A.2d 279.
Hugh C. Spernow, Paterson, argued the cause for appellant. (Evans, Hand and Evans, Paterson, of counsel).
Paul Rittenberg, Paterson, argued the cause for respondent. (Peter Hofstra, Paterson, attorney; Howard Stern, Paterson, on the brief).
The judgment under review is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge William J. Brennan, Jr., in the court below.
For affirmance: Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices OLIPHANT, WACHENFELD, BURLING and JACOBS--5.
For reversal: None.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Rotter v. Coconino County
... ... 423, 186 A.2d 702 (1962); Struyk v. Samuel Braen's Sons, 17 N.J.Super. 1, 85 A.2d 279, 281 ... ...
-
Weber v. Pieretti
... ... Cf. Struyk v. Samuel Braen's Sons, 17 N.J.Super. 1, 85 A.2d 279 ... ...
-
Kent v. Borough of Mendham
... ... 398, 174 A. 526 (E. & A. 1934); see also Struyk v. Samuel Braen's Sons, 17 N.J.Super. 1, 9, 85 A.2d 279 ... ...
-
Sieber v. Laawe
... ... Ardis, Samuel M. Conforth, John Leone, ... and Ernest A. Del Prete, ... Board of Adjustment of City of Newark, supra; Struyk ... Samuel Braen's Sons ... ...
-
CHAPTER 4 LOCAL LAND USE REGULATION OF EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES: EVOLVING JUDICIAL AND REGULATORY APPROACHES
...318 Mass. 216, 61 N.E.2d 243, cert. den., 326 U.S. 739 (1945); Struyk v. Samuel Braen's Sons, 17 N.J.Super. 1, 85 A.2d 279 (1951), aff'd, 9 N.J. 294, 88 A.2d 201 (1952); People v. Gerus, 19 Misc.2d 389, 69 N.Y.S.2d 283 (1942); People ex rel. Ventres v. Walsh, 121 Misc. 494, 201 N.Y.S. 226 (......