Stuart v. Cooper Tire and Rubber Co.
| Decision Date | 20 October 1989 |
| Docket Number | No. 89-CC-1742,89-CC-1742 |
| Citation | Stuart v. Cooper Tire and Rubber Co., 550 So.2d 641 (La. 1989) |
| Parties | Cecil L. STUART, et al. v. COOPER TIRE AND RUBBER CO., et al. 550 So.2d 641 |
| Court | Louisiana Supreme Court |
In re Stuart, Cecil L.; Roussel, Marilyn Peterson; Stuart, Harvey; Stuart, Cecil Jr.;--Plaintiff(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, supervisory and/or remedial writs; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CW88 1942;Parish of Washington, 22nd Judicial District Court, Div. "A", No. 53318, 58319.
Prior report: La.App., 544 So.2d 78.
Granted.Judgment of the court of appeal is reversed; trial court order for new trial is reinstated.
MARCUS and LEMMON, JJ., would grant the writ for argument.
...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
1 cases
-
Horton v. Mayeaux
...the motion did not request a new trial, even in the alternative. The same question was presented to this court in Stuart v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Co., 550 So.2d 641 (La.1989). In that case, a jury had entered a verdict in favor of the defendant, to which the plaintiff responded by filing a m......