Sturdivant v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP (Ex parte BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP.), 1110373

• Court: Supreme Court of Alabama
• Writing for the Court: MURDOCK, Justice.
• Citation: 159 So.3d 31
• Parties: Ex parte BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP. (In re Bessie T. Sturdivant v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP). Ronald C. Robinson v. Steven J. Cox and Robin K. Cox and Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC.
• Docket Number: 1110458.,1110373
• Decision Date: 13 September 2013

159 So.3d 31

Ex parte BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP.

(In re Bessie T. Sturdivant
v.
BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP).

Ronald C. Robinson
v.
Steven J. Cox and Robin K. Cox and Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC.

1110373
1110458.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Sept. 13, 2013.

159 So.3d 32

James W. Wertheim of McGlinchey Stafford PLLC, Cleveland, Ohio; and Alan M. Warfield of Jones, Walker, Waechter, Poitevent, Carrère & Denègre, LLP, Birmingham, for petitioner Ex parte BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP.

Henry A. Callaway III of Hand Arendall LLC, Mobile, for appellant Ronald C. Robinson.

Kenneth J. Lay of Hood & Lay LLC, Birmingham, for respondent Bessie T. Sturdivant.

Jim H. Fernandez of Fernandez & Combs, LLC, Mobile, for appellees Steven J. Cox and Robin K. Cox.

Gilbert L. Fontenot of Maples & Fontenot, LLP, Mobile, for appellee Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC.

Opinion

MURDOCK, Justice.

The above-styled petition for a writ of certiorari and appeal have been consolidated for the purpose of issuing one opinion.

I. Facts and Procedural History

A. Case No. 1110373

In case no. 1110373, we granted a petition for a writ of certiorari filed by BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP (“BAC”), challenging the reversal by the Court of Civil Appeals of a summary judgment entered by the Jefferson Circuit Court on BAC's ejectment action against Bessie T. Sturdivant. See Sturdivant v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, 159 So.3d 15 (Ala.Civ.App.2011). We reverse the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals and remand the case.

On December 31, 2009, BAC filed a complaint in ejectment against Sturdivant. Specifically, BAC alleged that it had sold at foreclosure certain property pursuant to the terms of a mortgage executed by Sturdivant, that it had purchased the property at the foreclosure sale, and that Sturdivant had failed to surrender possession of the property. Sturdivant answered and denied the material allegations of the complaint.

159 So.3d 33

BAC moved for a summary judgment, and Sturdivant opposed that motion. After conducting a hearing, the trial court, on October 29, 2010, entered a summary judgment in favor of BAC. The trial court also ordered that a writ of possession in favor of BAC be issued. Sturdivant filed a postjudgment motion, which the trial court denied. Sturdivant appealed.

The opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals in this action provides an extensive rendition of relevant facts, which are not disputed by the parties:

“In December 2007, Sturdivant obtained a loan from Security Atlantic Mortgage Co., Inc. (‘Security Atlantic’), to purchase a home. To secure the loan, Sturdivant executed a mortgage with Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (‘MERS'), ‘solely as nominee’ for Security Atlantic. The record indicates that the loan was insured by the Federal Housing Administration (‘FHA’). A portion of the security agreement for the mortgage reads:

“ ‘This security instrument is given to Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (“MERS”), solely as nominee for lender, as hereinafter defined, and lender's successors and assigns, as beneficiary.... For this purpose, borrower does hereby mortgage, grant and convey to MERS (solely as nominee for lender and lender's successors and assigns) and to the successors and assigns of MERS, with power of sale, the following described property located in Jefferson County, Alabama....

“ ‘... Borrower understands and agrees that MERS holds only legal title to the interest granted by borrower and the security instrument; but, if necessary to comply with law or custom, MERS (as nominee for lender and lender's successors and assigns) has the right to exercise any and all of those interests, including, but not limited to, the right to foreclose and sell the property; and to take any action required of lender....’

“... Sturdivant testified that in March 2009 she began contacting BAC about the possibility of modifying her loan payments.

“The record indicates that when Sturdivant did not make the loan payments due in April 2009 or May 2009, BAC sent a letter on June 8, 2009, in which it identified itself as the ‘servicer’ of her loan. In that letter, BAC notified Sturdivant that if her default on the terms of the mortgage was not cured, the loan payments would be accelerated and the balance of the loan would be due.

“BAC presented evidence indicating that in September 2009 it referred the matter to an attorney to begin the foreclosure process. The record contains two letters, each dated September 20, 2009, sent by BAC's attorney to Sturdivant. One of the September 20, 2009, letters identified BAC as the ‘holder of [Sturdivant's] mortgage,’ informed Sturdivant of the total amount due under the terms of the mortgage-loan contract, and notified her of the procedures for disputing the debt. The other September 20, 2009, letter from BAC's attorney to Sturdivant notified Sturdivant that BAC, identified as the holder of the mortgage, had instructed the attorney to proceed with the foreclosure of the mortgage and that a foreclosure sale was scheduled for October 28, 2009.

“....

“The foreclosure sale scheduled for October 28, 2009, was postponed until December 1, 2009, while BAC continued to review Sturdivant's request for a modification of her loan....

159 So.3d 34

“In his affidavit, which was submitted in support of BAC's summary-judgment motion, [Ken] Satsky[, an assistant vice president for BAC,] said that, ‘[i]n my employment capacity, I am personally familiar’ with Sturdivant's mortgage account. Satsky's affidavit stated that Sturdivant's mortgage had originated with MERS, on behalf of Security Atlantic or its successors and assigns, and that foreclosure proceedings had been initiated. Satsky's affidavit does not reference an assignment of the mortgage to BAC, and it does not indicate the identity of the entity that initiated the foreclosure proceedings. Satsky testified that Sturdivant defaulted on the note secured by the mortgage and that BAC ‘provided her with Notice of Default and acceleration of the debt due under said note by letter dated January 6, 2009.’ The record on appeal does not contain a letter dated January 6, 2009, and Satsky's affidavit does not refer to the September 20, 2009, letters BAC submitted to the trial court in support of its summary-judgment motion.

“Also in support of its summary-judgment motion, BAC submitted into evidence a statement that a notice of foreclosure had been published on November 7, 2009, in the Alabama Messenger, a ‘weekly newspaper of general circulation.’ See § 35–10–8, Ala.Code 1975 (governing the notice required for a foreclosure sale). In that notice, BAC stated that it was the ‘holder of [Sturdivant's] mortgage,’ which contained a power of sale, and that BAC would sell the property on December 1, 2009, at public auction. BAC also represented in its published notice of the proposed December 1, 2009, foreclosure sale that Sturdivant had mortgaged the property to MERS, as nominee for Security Atlantic or its successors and assigns, and that ‘said mortgage was subsequently assigned to BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, by instrument recorded in [the probate court].’

“On December 1, 2009, the property was sold at the foreclosure sale that BAC had scheduled. BAC was the purchaser of the property at that sale. Also on December 1, 2009, MERS assigned Sturdivant's mortgage to BAC.^[ [[^{1 ]}

“In support of its motion for a summary judgment, BAC submitted to the trial court a copy of its auctioneer's foreclosure deed, also dated December 1, 2009, which states, among other things, that MERS had assigned the mortgage to BAC, that BAC had recorded that assignment of the mortgage, and that BAC had completed other steps necessary to obtain a deed by virtue of its purchase of the property at the foreclosure sale. With regard to the assignment of the mortgage, the December 1, 2009, auctioneer's foreclosure deed specifically states:

“ ‘WHEREAS, BESSIE T. STURDIVANT, unmarried, executed a mortgage to Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. [MERS], acting solely as nominee for Lender and Lender's Successors and Assigns on the 18th day of December 2007, on that certain real property hereinafter described, which mortgage is recorded in Book LR200801, Page 21971, of the

159 So.3d 35

records in the Office of the Judge of Probate, Jefferson County, Alabama; which said mortgage was subsequently assigned to BAC Home Loans Servicing LP by instrument recorded in Book 200912Page 14464of said Probate Court records....'

“... The ‘book’ and ‘page’ numbers identified in the above-quoted portion of the December 1, 2009, auctioneer's foreclosure deed are not printed in typeface, as is the remainder of the deed. Rather, those numbers are handwritten insertions into the auctioneer's foreclosure

...