Styris v. Folk
Decision Date | 13 July 1943 |
Docket Number | 3393. |
Citation | 139 P.2d 614,62 Nev. 208 |
Parties | STYRIS v. FOLK. |
Court | Nevada Supreme Court |
Appeal from District Court, Second District, Washoe County; William McKnight, Judge.
Action between Eli Styris and Otis B. Folk.From an adverse judgment, Eli Styris appeals.On respondent's motion to dismiss appeal.
Motion denied.
Morley Griswold and George L. Vargas, both of Reno, for appellant.
Lloyd V. Smith, of Reno, for respondent.
The appeal in this case was perfected on the 19th day of October 1942.By stipulation the bill of exceptions was settled and allowed January 13, 1943.The transcript on appeal was filed in this court on May 26, 1943, thus there was a failure to comply with the requirements of Rule II of this court, which requires the transcript to be filed within thirty days after the appeal has been perfected and the bill of exceptions settled and allowed.
Because of such failure of appellant to file the transcript within the time provided by Rule II, respondent has moved to dismiss.
The transcript on appeal was filed before the motion to dismiss was noticed or made.By his failure to move to dismiss before the default had been cured by the filing of the transcript on appeal, respondent waived his right to take advantage of the provisions of said Rule II.Squires v. Mergenthaler Linotype Co.,60 Nev. 62, 99 P.2d 20.
We think the decision in the above cited case is sound and should be adhered to.
The ...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Styris v. Folk
...for plaintiff on a jury's verdict and an order denying defendant's motion for a new trial, defendant appeals. Affirmed. See, also, 139 P.2d 614. Morley Griswold and George L. Vargas, both of for appellant. Lloyd V. Smith, of Reno, for respondent. DUCKER, Justice. Respondent, plaintiff in th......
-
Mahan v. Hafen
...is a factual matter regardless of whether the negligence arose by violation of statute or by ordinary negligence. Styris v. Folk, 62 Nev. 208, 209, 139 P.2d 614, 146 P.2d 782. 'Negligence per se and proximate cause are two separate and distinct issues. While one is presumed as a matter of l......
-
Armstrong v. Onufrock
...Failing in this duty, he is liable under the doctrine of last clear chance, for the natural consequences of his acts. Styris v. Folk, 62 Nev. 208, 209, 139 P.2d 614, 146 P.2d 782; Deiss v. Southern Pac. Co., 56 Nev. 151, 47 P.2d 928, 53 P.2d As a separate cause of action, Duane's mother sue......
-
Hotels El Rancho, Inc. v. Pray
... ... appeal, respondent waived her right to take advantage of the ... provisions of said Rule II. Styris v. Folk, 62 Nev ... 208, 139 P.2d 614, 146 P.2d 782; Squires v. Mergenthaler ... Linotype Co., 60 Nev. 62, 99 P.2d 20. Furthermore, the ... ...