Sullivan, Long & Hagerty v. Southern Elec. Generating Co.
Decision Date | 08 September 1995 |
Citation | 667 So.2d 722 |
Parties | SULLIVAN, LONG & HAGERTY v. SOUTHERN ELECTRIC GENERATING COMPANY. 1940692. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Appeal from Shelby Circuit Court, No. CV-94-243; Michael Joiner, Judge.
Sydney F. Frazier, Jr., Birmingham, for Appellant.
M. Stanford Blanton and Lisa J. Sharp, Birmingham, for Appellee.
Sullivan, Long & Hagerty ("Sullivan Long") brought a declaratory judgment action against Southern Electric Generating Company ("SEGCO"), seeking to determine SEGCO's obligations to contribute to a federal retirement fund for the benefit of Sullivan Long employees who had performed work under a 1974 contract between the parties. The trial court entered a summary judgment for SEGCO, holding that any obligation to contribute to the fund ended when the contract expired. Sullivan Long appeals.
In 1974, Sullivan Long signed a five-year contract with SEGCO, agreeing to mine and deliver coal from SEGCO land. SEGCO agreed to pay Sullivan Long 50 cents per ton of coal produced, as well as other "Costs," as provided for in the contract. These "Costs" were set out in Paragraph 12(g)(4)(A) of the agreement:
(Some emphasis original; other emphasis added.)
The term "welfare and retirement fund" in this provision refers to the 1950 and 1974 United Mine Workers of America Benefit Plans and Trusts (hereinafter "1950/1974 Trusts"), which provided health care benefits to coal industry employees who retired before 1974. As a signatory to the National Bituminous Coal ("NBC") Wage Agreements that established the 1950/1974 Trusts, Sullivan Long was required during the term of its contract with SEGCO to contribute to the 1950/1974 Trusts.
Pursuant to Paragraph 12(g)(4)(A), SEGCO paid these contributions on Sullivan Long's behalf. When, in the late 1970's, nationwide contributions to the 1950/1974 Trusts dropped precipitously because of changes in the coal industry, a third NBC Agreement in 1978 restructured the 1950/1974 Trusts. SEGCO then paid the adjusted amount of Sullivan Long's required contribution to the restructured fund, until the contract terminated in 1979.
In 1992, in response to escalating health care costs and a continued depletion in contributions to the 1950/1974 Trusts, Congress enacted the Coal Industry Retiree Health...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
BOARD OF WATER & SEWER COM'RS v. BILL HARBERT CONST. CO.
...any doubt will be resolved in favor of the first part, considering the instrument as a whole." Sullivan, Long & Hagerty v. Southern Elec. Generating Co., 667 So.2d 722, 725 (Ala.1995) (citations omitted). See also Winkleblack v. Murphy, 811 So.2d 521 (Ala.2001); Scherf v. Renfroe, 266 Ala. ......
-
Porter Capital Corp. v. Thomas
...destroy, the contract and that will give effect and meaning to all of its terms. See id. at 948–49;Sullivan, Long & Hagerty v. Southern Elec. Generating Co., 667 So.2d 722, 725 (Ala.1995). Additionally, ‘if there exists inconsistency between two clauses of a contract which cannot be reconci......
-
State ex rel. Riley v. Lorillard Tobacco
...to all terms used.'" Medical Servs., LLC v. GMW & Co., 969 So.2d 158, 162 (Ala.2006) (quoting Sullivan, Long & Hagerty v. Southern Elec. Generating Co., 667 So.2d 722, 725 (Ala.1995)). The enforcement provision of the agreement, § VII(a)(3), does provide that for the State the Montgomery Ci......
-
Homes of Legend, Inc. v. McCollough
...destroy, the contract and that will give effect and meaning to all of its terms. See id. at 948-49; Sullivan, Long & Hagerty v. Southern Elec. Generating Co., 667 So.2d 722, 725 (Ala.1995). Additionally, "if there exists inconsistency between two clauses of a contract which cannot be reconc......