Sullivan v. Bd. of Regents of Normal Sch.
Decision Date | 11 October 1932 |
Citation | 209 Wis. 242,244 N.W. 563 |
Parties | SULLIVAN v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF NORMAL SCHOOLS. |
Court | Wisconsin Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Dane County; A. G. Zimmerman, Circuit Judge.
Action by Marie A. Sullivan, née Van Ermen, against the Board of Regents of Normal Schools. From an order overruling a demurrer to the amended complaint, defendant appeals.--[By Editorial Staff.]
Reversed, with directions.
Action begun April 19, 1932; order entered June 27, 1932. Demurrer. Plaintiff's complaint sets out two causes of action, in the first of which the plaintiff seeks to recover a balance of $4,583.31, alleged to be due her on her teaching contract, and in the second, she seeks to recover $1,000 alleged to be the reasonable value of her services as manager of the cafeteria of the Milwaukee Normal School for the year 1926-27.
There was a demurrer to the amended complaint which was overruled, and from the order overruling the demurrer, the defendant appeals.John W. Reynolds, Atty. Gen., and Herbert H. Naujoks, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.
Sullivan & Taugher, of Milwaukee (John J. Sullivan, of Milwaukee, of counsel), for respondent.
The sole question raised upon this appeal is whether or not an action for the recovery of a money judgment may be maintained against the Board of Regents of Normal Schools.
Section 37.01 provides: “For the government of the normal schools established, and which may hereafter be established, and for the performance of the duties prescribed to them, there is constituted a board of eleven regents, called ‘The Board of Regents of Normal Schools.’ * * *”
Section 37.02(1) provides:
Section 37.07 provides: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State ex rel. Teaching Assistants Ass'n v. University of Wisconsin-Madison
...immunity. Such a contention would be without merit. See Lister, 72 Wis.2d 282, 240 N.W.2d 610; Sullivan v. Board of Regents of Normal Schools, 209 Wis. 242, 244 N.W. 563 (1932).28 See n. 14, and related text. The motion suggested that the court treat the action as one for declaratory judgme......
-
Boehner v. Heise
...qualify for immunity, as opposed to an "independent going concern," which would not be immune to suit. Sullivan v. Board of Regents, 209 Wis. 242, 244 N.W. 563, 564 (1932) (finding that a board of regents "is an agency of the state set up to perform certain specified administrative duties")......
-
State ex rel. Warren v. Nusbaum
...Authority v. Dammann, supra (direct state assistance to establishment of municipal public utilities).15 Sullivan v. Board of Regents of Normal Schools (1932), 209 Wis. 242, 244 N.W. 563.16 The Authority constitutes an 'independent going concern' within the meaning of such a term used in tho......
-
Mayhugh v. State
...(1969) ; Majerus, 39 Wis.2d at 314, 159 N.W.2d 86.¶ 14 This court first referred to independent going concerns in Sullivan v. Bd. of Regents, 209 Wis. 242, 244 N.W. 563 (1932). There, the plaintiff brought suit against the Board of Regents, asserting that the State had waived sovereign immu......