Sullivan v. Little Hunting Park, Inc
| Decision Date | 01 October 1967 |
| Docket Number | No. 1188,1188 |
| Citation | 88 S.Ct. 2279,20 L.Ed.2d 1346,392 U.S. 657 |
| Parties | Paul E. SULLIVAN et al. v. LITTLE HUNTING PARK, INC., et al |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Allison W. Brown, Jr., Robert M. Alexander, Jack Greenberg and James M. Nabrit III, for petitioners.
John Chas. Harris, for respondents.
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is vacated. The case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia for further consideration in light of Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co., 392 U.S. 409, 88 S.Ct. 2186, 20 L.Ed.2d 1189.
To continue reading
Request your trial
9 cases
-
Dobbins v. Local 212, International Bro. of Elec. Wkrs.
...subject matter is, therefore, within 42 U.S.C. § 1981. Cf. Machinist v. Gonzales, 356 U.S. 617 (1958); Sullivan v. Little Hunting Park, 392 U.S. 657, 88 S.Ct. 2279, 20 L.Ed.2d 1346 (1968). 4. At least since Jones v. Mayer, a strictly private right, be it in the property field as such, or th......
-
Sullivan v. Little Hunting Park, Inc
...Appeals for further consideration in light of Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co., 392 U.S. 409, 88 S.Ct. 2186, 20 L.Ed.2d 1189. 392 U.S 657, 88 S.Ct. 2279, 20 L.Ed.2d 1346. On the remand, the Supreme Court of Appeals restated its prior position stating, 'We had no jurisdiction in the cases when t......
-
Gomez-Perez v. Potter
...Congress had good reason to expect that this broad ban would be interpreted in the same way that Sullivan v. Little Hunting Park, Inc., 392 U.S. 657, 88 S.Ct. 2279, 20 L.Ed.2d 1346 (1968), had interpreted the broad ban on racial discrimination in 42 U.S.C. § 1982, the inference that respond......
- State v. Falco
Request a trial to view additional results