Summers v. SKIBS A/S MYKEN, 13458
| Citation | 296 F.2d 548 |
| Decision Date | 17 November 1961 |
| Docket Number | No. 13458,13609.,13458 |
| Parties | Elijah SUMMERS, Appellant, v. SKIBS A/S MYKEN. |
| Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (3rd Circuit) |
Marvin I. Barish, Philadelphia, Pa. (Abraham E. Freedman, Freedman, Landy & Lorry, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.
Harrison G. Kildare, Philadelphia, Pa. (Rawle & Henderson, Philadelphia, Pa., Thomas F. Mount, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.
Before McLAUGHLIN, STALEY and FORMAN, Circuit Judges.
Despite the able and thorough argument on behalf of appellant we are convinced that the prospective interpretation of the Pennsylvania Non-Resident Vessel Owner Act, 12 P.S. § 336, by the district court is sound.
The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
5 cases
-
United States v. Shell Oil Co.
...provision. Shell cites in support of this argument Summers v. Skibs A/S Myken, 191 F.Supp. 929, 930 (E.D.Pa.), aff'd per curiam, 296 F.2d 548 (3d Cir.1961). In response, the government points out that all the other verbs in § 107(a) including "costs ... incurred," are in the past tense (wit......
-
Krueger v. Rheem Mfg. Co.
...are cited. State ex rel. Clay Equipment Corp. v. Jensen, Mo., 363 S.W.2d 666; Summers v. Skibs A/S Myken, 191 F.Supp. 929, affirmed 3rd Cir., 296 F.2d 548; Cassan v. Fern, 33 N.J.Super. 96, 109 A.2d 482. 'Shall' may be used to indicate future application. The suggested phrase 'shall hereaft......
-
Mayor and Bd. of Aldermen v. Drew Chemical Corp.
...I therefore do not believe that the case of Summers v. Skibbs A/S Myken, 191 F.Supp. 929, 930 (E.D.Pa.), aff'd per curiam, 296 F.2d 548 (3d Cir. 1961) is controlling on the issue before Similarly, I am persuaded by Judge Carrigan's analysis that the requirement in the Act that costs be cons......
- Lowe v. Metro. Ins. & Annuity Co.
Request a trial to view additional results