Sumter v. Sheffield
Decision Date | 02 July 1952 |
Docket Number | Civ. A. No. 1348. |
Citation | 116 F. Supp. 373 |
Parties | SUMTER et al. v. SHEFFIELD et al. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Southern District of Texas |
T. H. Sumter, Houston, Tex., for plaintiffs.
Stewart, Burgess & Morris, W. Carloss Morris, Jr., Houston, Tex., for defendants.
This memorandum and order is entered with respect to plaintiffs' complaint filed in this Court December 28, 1951, as follows:
It clearly appearing that this Court is without jurisdiction of this case, in that:
(a) Plaintiffs' cause of action, if any they have, does not arise under the Constitution, Laws, or Treaties of the United States. See Section 1331, Title 28, U. S. Code Judiciary and Judicial Procedure, and Smith v. McCullough, 270 U. S. 456, 46 S.Ct. 338, 70 L.Ed. 682; 35 C.J.S., Federal Courts, § 80, p. 910; Hull v. Burr, 234 U.S. 712, 34 S.Ct. 892, 58 L.Ed. 1587; Doidge v. Cunard S.S. Co., 1 Cir., 19 F.2d 500; South Covington & C. St. Ry. Co. v. City of Newport, Ky., 259 U.S. 97, 42 S.Ct. 418, 66 L.Ed. 842; Woodhouse v. Budwesky, 4 Cir., 70 F.2d 61, certiorari denied, 293 U.S. 573, 55 S.Ct. 84, 79 L.Ed. 671; Harding v. State of Illinois, 196 U.S. 78, 25 S.Ct. 176, 49 L.Ed. 394; Polhemus v. American Medical Association, 10 Cir., 145 F.2d 357; Swank v. Patterson, 9 Cir., 139 F.2d 145; Jewell v. Cleveland Wrecking Co. of Cincinnati, 8 Cir., 111 F.2d 305; Ford Bros. & Co. v. Eddington Distilling Co., D.C., 30 F.Supp. 213; Marshall v. Desert Properties Co., 9 Cir., 103 F.2d 551; Jefferson v. Gypsy Oil Co., 10 Cir., 27 F.2d 304.
(b) There is not diversity of citizenship between...
To continue reading
Request your trial- Miller v. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co., Civ. No. 1767.
-
Sumter v. Sheffield, 14396.
...entitled and numbered cause because not timely taken, it is ordered by the Court that said appeal be, and the same is hereby, dismissed. 116 F.Supp. 373. ...