Sunshine Jr. Food Stores, Inc. v. Thompson

Decision Date02 February 1982
Docket NumberAG-337,Nos. AC-416,s. AC-416
Citation409 So.2d 190
PartiesSUNSHINE JR. FOOD STORES, INC., and Morrison Assurance Company, Appellants, v. Fred THOMPSON, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

C. Wes Pittman of Urquhart & Pittman, P. A., Panama City, for appellants.

Charles A. Wade, Fort Walton Beach, for appellee.

WIGGINTON, Judge.

Appellant seeks review of the deputy commissioner's order awarding Thompson temporary total disability compensation benefits for injuries sustained pursuant to an automobile accident that allegedly occurred in the course and scope of his employment. We must reverse.

At the time of the accident, claimant was a district manager for Sunshine Jr. Food Stores, Inc., and was in charge of ten stores in Okaloosa, Walton and Washington Counties located in West Florida. Included among claimant's responsibilities was occasional observation of the routine of store clerks working in his district. At 9:00 on the evening of the accident, claimant, joined by his two minor children, drove a short distance from his home to inspect Store Number 308, located on U. S. Highway 98, near Wynn Haven in Okaloosa County. He observed the store clerk from his parked car for a short period of time, then, becoming bored, proceeded to drive west to "kill time" until he could return to Store Number 308 to inspect the store after its closing at midnight.

Claimant drove west on Highway 98, leaving Okaloosa County and his district. He continued in the direction of Pensacola, planning to get gas and to kill about an hour and a half of time. In doing so, he entered Gulf Breeze, turned off U. S. 98 and crossed the toll bridge leading to Pensacola Beach in Escambia County. Claimant drove easterly, returning along Navarre Beach Road which parallels the Gulf of Mexico, and which would ultimately lead him to U. S. Highway 98. This deviation encompassed approximately 40 miles. However, before he returned to the main highway, claimant missed a turn and skidded into a roadway sign, causing the accident in question.

The deputy commissioner held the accident to be compensable, finding that although the trip encompassed both business and pleasure, the predominant purpose for the trip involved business.

The deputy erred in awarding temporary total disability benefits to claimant. The injury suffered by claimant was noncompensable because it was not incurred within the course and scope of his employment.

It is the general rule in Florida that an employee who deviates from his employment to engage in a personal errand is not entitled to compensation for damages sustained in an accident occurring before he returns to the course he was pursuing in the interest of the employer. N. & L. Auto Parts Co. v. Doman, 111 So.2d 270 (Fla. 1st DCA 1959); Maroney v. Edward A. Kelly & Sons, Inc., 195 So.2d 208 (Fla.1967); Concrete & Metal Form Erectors, Inc. v. Volkers, IRC Order 2-2706 (1973).

In N. & L. Auto Parts Co., claimant was a route salesman who, on the date of the injury, was registered for the night at a motor court, intending to call on customers of the company the next day. After refreshing himself, claimant called a taxi and drove to a nearby town to see a movie. Upon returning to the motel and after debarking from the cab, claimant walked along the driveway in the direction of his room. While walking across the lawn to reach his door, claimant's ankle turned and he fell, breaking his leg.

In holding this injury to be compensable, the court enunciated the general rule that "an employee whose work entails travel away from the employer's premises is within the course...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Cox v. COASTAL PRODUCTS COMPANY, INC.
    • United States
    • Maine Supreme Court
    • July 2, 2001
    ...970 S.W.2d 303 (1998); Boulevard Manor Nursing Home v. Lacombe, 557 So.2d 945 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1990); Sunshine Jr. Food Stores, Inc. v. Thompson, 409 So.2d 190 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1982); Lockwood v. Bd. of Trustees, Speedway Methodist Church, 144 Ind.App. 430, 246 N.E.2d 774 (1969); Danos v. G......
  • Rodriguez v. Tri-State Carriers, Inc.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • September 4, 2001
    ...272 (Fla. 1st DCA 1959); see Am. Family Pizza v. Taylor, 573 So.2d 956, 957-58 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Sunshine Jr. Food Stores, Inc. v. Thompson, 409 So.2d 190, 191 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). While going to and coming from work ordinarily fall under the general heading of "personal missions," see, ......
  • Am. Econ. Ins. Co. v. Traylor/Wolfe Architects, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Middle District of Florida
    • August 6, 2014
    ...792 So. 2d 1253, 1254 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001) (quotations omitted). Though not an insurance coverage case, Sunshine Jr. Food Stores, Inc. v. Thompson, 409 So. 2d 190 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982) provides a useful illustration.6 There, a district manager for a chain of stores had been inspecting the work......
  • IMC Phosphates Co. v. Prater
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • March 10, 2005
    ...an accident occurring before he returns to the course he was pursuing in the interest of the employer. Sunshine Jr. Food Stores, Inc. v. Thompson, 409 So.2d 190, 191 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); N & L Auto Parts Co. v. Doman, 111 So.2d 270 (Fla. 1st DCA 1959). We can infer from the final order and ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT