Super Tire Engineering Co. v. McCorkle, No. 71-1773
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit |
| Writing for the Court | McLAUGHLIN, ADAMS and GIBBONS, Circuit |
| Citation | 469 F.2d 911 |
| Parties | SUPER TIRE ENGINEERING COMPANY et al., Appellants, v. Lloyd W. McCORKLE, Commissioner of the Department of Institutions and Agencies of the State of New Jersey, et al., Appellees. |
| Docket Number | 71-1774 and 71-1775.,No. 71-1773 |
| Decision Date | 22 November 1972 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
10 practice notes
-
Dworman v. Mayor & Bd. of Aldermen, etc., Morristown, Civ. A. No. 1133-73.
...L. Ed.2d 560 (1972); Benton v. Maryland, 395 U.S. 784, 788, 89 S.Ct. 2056, 23 L. Ed.2d 707 (1969); Super Tire Engineering Co. v. McCorkle, 469 F.2d 911, 914 (3d Cir. 1972). Although the existence of the requisite case or controversy is not always easy to determine, "basically, the question ......
-
Super Tire Engineering Company v. Corkle 8212 1554, No. 72
...fine or other penalty could be only rarely adjudicated, and the purposes of the Declaratory Judgment Act would be frustrated. Pp. 125—127. 469 F.2d 911, reversed and remanded. Lawrence M. Cohen, Lederer, Fox & Grove, Chicago, Ill., for petitioners. Robert F. O'Brien, Tomar, Parks, Seliger, ......
-
Super Tire Engineering Co. v. McCorkle, Civ. A. No. 853-71.
...States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, the action was remanded with instructions to vacate and dismiss the complaint as moot. 469 F.2d 911, 922 (3d Cir. 1972). The United States Supreme Court reversed and remanded for an adjudication on the merits of the controversy holding that dec......
-
AMERICANS U. FOR SEP. OF CHURCH & STATE v. Board of Ed., No. 1561.
...Further, the issues raised in this action satisfy the four "tests" outlined in Super Tire Engineering Co. v. McCorkle, 3d Cir., 469 F.2d 911, 915 "Analysis . . . reveals four concerns that the Supreme Court addresses in terms of mootness. They are: that some sort of judicial decree be possi......
Request a trial to view additional results
9 cases
-
Dworman v. Mayor & Bd. of Aldermen, etc., Morristown, Civ. A. No. 1133-73.
...L. Ed.2d 560 (1972); Benton v. Maryland, 395 U.S. 784, 788, 89 S.Ct. 2056, 23 L. Ed.2d 707 (1969); Super Tire Engineering Co. v. McCorkle, 469 F.2d 911, 914 (3d Cir. 1972). Although the existence of the requisite case or controversy is not always easy to determine, "basically, the question ......
-
Super Tire Engineering Company v. Corkle 8212 1554, No. 72
...fine or other penalty could be only rarely adjudicated, and the purposes of the Declaratory Judgment Act would be frustrated. Pp. 125—127. 469 F.2d 911, reversed and remanded. Lawrence M. Cohen, Lederer, Fox & Grove, Chicago, Ill., for petitioners. Robert F. O'Brien, Tomar, Parks, Seliger, ......
-
Super Tire Engineering Co. v. McCorkle, Civ. A. No. 853-71.
...States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, the action was remanded with instructions to vacate and dismiss the complaint as moot. 469 F.2d 911, 922 (3d Cir. 1972). The United States Supreme Court reversed and remanded for an adjudication on the merits of the controversy holding that dec......
-
AMERICANS U. FOR SEP. OF CHURCH & STATE v. Board of Ed., No. 1561.
...Further, the issues raised in this action satisfy the four "tests" outlined in Super Tire Engineering Co. v. McCorkle, 3d Cir., 469 F.2d 911, 915 "Analysis . . . reveals four concerns that the Supreme Court addresses in terms of mootness. They are: that some sort of judicial decree be possi......
Request a trial to view additional results