Superior Films v. Department of Education of State of Ohio, Division of Film Censorship Commercial Pictures Corporation v. Regents of University of State of New York
Citation | 74 S.Ct. 286,98 L.Ed. 329,346 U.S. 587 |
Decision Date | 18 January 1954 |
Docket Number | 274,Nos. 217,s. 217 |
Parties | SUPERIOR FILMS, Inc., Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION OF STATE OF OHIO, DIVISION OF FILM CENSORSHIP, Clyde Hissong, Supt. COMMERCIAL PICTURES CORPORATION, Appellant, v. REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF STATE OF NEW YORK |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
The judgments are reversed. Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. Wilson, 343 U.S. 495, 72 S.Ct. 777, 96 L.Ed. 1098.
The argument of Ohio and New York that the government may establish censorship over moving pictures is one I cannot accept. In 1925 Minnesota passed a law aimed at suppressing before publication any 'malicious, scandalous and defamatory newspaper'.1 The Court, speaking through Chief Justice Hughes, struck down that law as violating the Fourteenth Amendment, which has made the First Amendment applicable to the States. Near v. State of Minnesota, 283 U.S. 697, 51 S.Ct. 625, 626, 75 L.Ed. 1357. The 'chief purpose' of the constitutional guaranty of liberty of the press, said the Court, was 'to prevent previous restraints upon publication.' 283 US. at page 713, 51 S.Ct. at page 630.
The history of censorship is so well known it need not be summarized here. Certainly a system, still in force in some nations, which required a newspaper to submit to a board its news items, editorials, and cartoons before it published them could not be sustained. Nor could book publishers be required to submit their novels, poems, and tracts to censors for clearance before publication. Any such scheme of censorship would be in irreconciable conflict with the language and purpose of the First Amendment.
Nor is it conceivable to me that producers of plays for the legitimate theatre or for television could be required to submit their manuscripts to censors on pain of penalty for producing them without approval. Certainly the spoken word is as freely protected against prior restraints as that which is written. Such indeed is the force of our decision in Thomas v. Collins, 323 U.S. 516, 540, 65 S.Ct. 315, 327, 89 L.Ed. 430. The freedom of the platform which it espouses carries with it freedom of the stage.
The same result in the case of motion pictures necessarily follows as a consequence of our holding in Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. Wilson, 343 U.S. 495, 502, 72 S.Ct. 777, 780, 781, 96 L.Ed. 1098, that motion pictures are 'within the free speech and free press guaranty of the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Furr v. Town of Swansea
...777, 96 L.Ed. 1098 (1952); Gelling v. Texas, 343 U.S. 960, 72 S.Ct. 1002, 96 L.Ed. 1359 (1952); Superior Films, Inc. v. Department of Education, 346 U.S. 587, 74 S.Ct. 286, 98 L.Ed. 329 (1954); Staub v. Baxley, 355 U.S. 313, 78 S.Ct. 277, 2 L.Ed.2d 302 (1958); Cox v. Louisiana, 379 U.S. 536......
-
Scull v. United States
...S.Ct. 285, 78 L.Ed.2d 262 (1983); United States v. Pilcher, 672 F.2d 875, 877 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 973, 103 S.Ct. 306, 74 S.Ct. 286 (1982); United States v. Neff, 615 F.2d 1235, 1239 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 925, 100 S.Ct. 3018, 65 L.Ed.2d 1117 (1980). A taxpayer, h......
-
Interstate Circuit, Inc v. City of Dallas United Artists Corporation v. City of Dallas, s. 56
...343 U.S. 960, 72 S.Ct. 1002, 96 L.Ed. 1359 (1952); 'moral, educational or amusing and harmless,' Superior Films, Inc. v. Department of Education, 346 U.S. 587, 74 S.Ct. 286, 98 L.Ed. 329 (1954); 'immoral,' and 'tend to corrupt morals,' Commercial Pictures Corp. v. Regents, 346 U.S. 587, 74 ......
-
Jacobellis v. State of Ohio
...States, 354 U.S. 476, 508, 77 S.Ct. 1304, 1321, 1 L.Ed.2d 1498, and his concurring opinion in Superior Films, Inc. v. Department of Education, 346 U.S. 587, 588, 74 S.Ct. 286, 98 L.Ed. 329, in both of which I Mr. Justice STEWART, concurring. It is possible to read the Court's opinion in Rot......
-
Deportation for a Sin: Why Moral Turpitude Is Void for Vagueness
...at 504-05. 296. Superior Films, Inc. v. Dep't of Educ., 112 N.E.2d 311 (Ohio 1954), rev'dper curiam, Commercial Pictures Corp. v. Regents, 346 U.S. 587 (1954). In a companion case, Superior Films, Inc. v. Department of Education, 346 U.S. 587 (1954), the Court also struck down as void an or......
-
The South Counterattacks: the Anti-Naacp Laws
...v. Wilson, 343 U.S. 495 (1952); Gelling v. Texas, 343 U.S. 960 (1952); SuperiorFilms Inc. v. Department of Education of Ohio, 346 U.S. 587 Prior restraint has been permitted by the Court under certain circumstances, but of the cases presently to be noted, the first two involved commercial e......
-
First Amendment Follies: Forbidden Films and the Kansas State Board of Review
...Censorship, 112 N.E.2d 311, 313 (1953), rev’d sub nom. Superior Films, Inc. v. Dep’t of Educ. of State of Ohio, Div. of Film Censorship, 346 U.S. 587, 74 S.Ct. 286, 98 L.Ed. 329 (1954). The Kansas State Board of Review also banned the film because it “[tended] to degrade both colored and Wh......
-
The First Amendment Follies: Forbidden Films and the Kansas State Board of Review
...Censorship, 112 N.E.2d 311, 313 (1953), revd sub nom. Superior Films, Inc. v. Dep't of Educ. of State of Ohio, Div. of Film Censorship, 346 U.S. 587, 74 S. Ct. 286, 98 L. Ed. 329 (1954). The Kansas State Board of Review also banned the film because it "[tended] to degrade both colored and W......