Superior Mining Co. v. Indus. Comm'n

Decision Date20 October 1923
Docket NumberNo. 15396.,15396.
Citation141 N.E. 165,309 Ill. 339
PartiesSUPERIOR MINING CO. v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION et al.
CourtIllinois Supreme Court

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Error to Circuit Court, St. Clair County; L. E. Bernreuter, Judge.

Proceeding for compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act by Henry Harszy, employee, opposed by the Superior Mining Company, employer. An award of the Industrial Commission was confirmed by the superior court, and the employer brings error.

Judgment reversed, and decision set aside.

M. C. Young, of St. Louis, Mo. (Burton & Hamilton, of Peoria, of counsel), for plaintiff in error.

W. J. MacDonald, of Chicago, for defendant in error.

THOMPSON, J.

While in the employ of the Superior Mining Company, Henry Harszy was knocked down by a fall of slate and received scratches and cuts about his face. He was temporarily incapacitated for two weeks and received compensation for this period. He claims further compensation for a disfigurement over the left eye, and an award amounting to $192 has been made. This writ of error has been prosecutedby leave of court to review the judgment of the circuit court of St. Clair county confirming this award.

Dr. R. E. Niedringhaus testified that when he was standing 10 feet from Harszy he could not see a scar, but that when he moved to within 2 feet of him and lifted up the supra-orbital skin he could see two slight, blue scars, commonly called coal scars; that the smaller one was about a quarter of an inch long, and the larger about three-quarters of an inch long; that these scars are hidden when the eye is open, for the reason that Harszy has a prominent supra-orbital ridge. Samuel C. Crouch, a photographer, testified that when the eyebrow was raised by the hand he could see the blue scars at a distance of 4 1/2 feet. A photograph of Harszy, made when he was sitting about 12 feet from the camera, is in the record.

The object of Workmen's Compensation Laws is to compensate for loss of earning power resulting from industrial accidents. While it is not necessary that there should be a showing of an actual loss of earning power before compensation can be made for a disfigurement (Williams Co. v. Industrial Com., 303 Ill. 352, 135 N. E. 758), the evidence ought to show that the disfigurement for which compensation is sought bears some relation to the capacity to earn and to secure profitable employment. Where a man has suffered serious injuries to his hands, head, or face, it is often true that they are of such a...

To continue reading

Request your trial
33 cases
  • Requests of Governor and Senate on Constitutionality of Act No. 294 of Public Acts of 1972, In re
    • United States
    • Michigan Supreme Court
    • 18 Junio 1973
    ...v. Ware Shoals Mfg. Co., 192 S.C. 459, 7 S.E.2d 226 (1940) (Serious bodily disfigurement).Superior Mining Co. v. Industrial Commission, 309 Ill. 339, 141 N.E. 165 (1923) (Permanent and serious disfigurement).Tinsley v. Walgreen Drug Co., 197 S.C. 415, 15 S.E.2d 667 (1941) (Serious bodily di......
  • County of Dane v. Labor and Industry Review
    • United States
    • Wisconsin Supreme Court
    • 23 Enero 2009
    ...Illinois Supreme Court, wherein it addressed disfigurement under the Illinois workmen's compensation law. Superior Min. Co. v. Indus. Comm'n, 309 Ill. 339, 141 N.E. 165, 166 (1923). Superior was decided only eight years after the Wisconsin disfigurement statute's original enactment. It evid......
  • Bonin v. Ferrellgas, Inc.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Louisiana — District of US
    • 6 Agosto 2003
    ...Elec. Co-op., 95-914 (La. App. 3 Cir. 1/31/96), 670 So.2d 406, 412 (citing Superior Mining Co. v. Indus. Comm'n, 309 111. 339, 141 N.E. 165 (1923)). 47. Squibb v. Century Group, 01-1527 (La.App. 3 Cir. 4/17/02), 824 So.2d 361, writ denied, 02-1405 (La.9/13/02), 824 So.2d 1173. 48. Ceasar v.......
  • Falcone v. Branker
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court
    • 19 Junio 1975
    ...classic definition of the phrase 'permanent Serious disfigurement' in a compensation setting was made in Superior Mining Co. v. Industrial Commission, 309 Ill. 339, 141 N.E. 165 (1923): * * * The act does not provide compensation for every mark or scar, nor for every disfigurement. A disfig......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT