Sutherland v. Selling
Decision Date | 20 December 1926 |
Docket Number | No. 4980.,4980. |
Parties | SUTHERLAND, Alien Property Custodian, et al. v. SELLING et al. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
E. W. Wickey, of Washington, D. C., Thomas Mannix, and Guy C. H. Corliss, both of Portland, Or., for appellants.
Joseph, Haney & Littlefield and John C. Veatch, all of Portland, Or., for appellees.
Before GILBERT and RUDKIN, Circuit Judges, and JAMES, District Judge.
This was a suit by the Alien Property Custodian and the E. Henry Wemme Company, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the state of Oregon, against the trustees of the E. Henry Wemme Endowment Fund, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the state of Oregon, the E. Henry Wemme Endowment Fund as such corporation, the Attorney General of the state of Oregon, and the district attorney of Multnomah county, state of Oregon, to recover certain propery devised in trust by E. Henry Wemme, deceased, and for an accounting.
E. Henry Wemme died testate at Portland, Or., December 17, 1914. At the time of his death his estate consisted largely of the capital stock of the E. Henry Wemme Company, and of certain real property in the city of Portland. The stock in the corporation was bequeathed to relatives, a majority of whom lived in Germany, and became alien enemies upon our entry into the World War. The real property in Portland, of the value of $350,000, was devised to trustees in trust for the following uses and purposes:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Schering Corporation v. Gilbert
...property. Hamburg-American Line T. & N. Co. v. United States, 277 U. S. 138, 48 S.Ct. 470, 72 L.Ed. 822; Sutherland, Alien Property Custodian v. Selling, 9 Cir., 16 F.2d 865, certiorari denied, 273 U.S. 760, 47 S.Ct. 475, 71 L.Ed. 878. And so the plaintiff remained the owner of the patent e......
-
Lyeth v. Hoey
...jurisdiction under which this taxpayer received it. Uterhart v. United States, 240 U.S. 598, 36 S.Ct. 417, 60 L.Ed. 819; Sutherland v. Selling, 9 Cir., 16 F.2d 865. The procedure which was followed in reaching the compromise of the will contest was one well known in Massachusetts; one, inde......