Sutton v. Eastern Viavi Co., 8257.
Decision Date | 08 December 1943 |
Docket Number | No. 8257.,8257. |
Citation | 138 F.2d 959 |
Parties | SUTTON et al. v. EASTERN VIAVI CO. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit |
Weightstill Woods, of Chicago, Ill., for appellant.
L. M. McBride and Edward H. Baker, Jr., both of Chicago, Ill., for appellee.
Before SPARKS and KERNER, Circuit Judges, and LINDLEY, District Judge.
Appellants, beneficiaries of a trust, sued the trustee and appellee, charging misapplication of trust funds by the trustee and praying restoration thereof. The only reference to appellee was that contained in two paragraphs of the complaint as follows:
Upon motion, these two paragraphs, with others, were stricken. Appellants did not amend. Thereupon appellee moved to dismiss upon the ground that the complaint stated no valid claim for relief as against it. This motion the court allowed and this appeal followed. In view of the fact that after that time there remained in the complaint no charge against appellee, the judgment must be affirmed unless the action striking the paragraphs was erroneous. Thus, our narrow question is whether the matter stricken stated a cause of action against appellee.
In this action charging the trustee with misapplication of trust funds, appellee, a stranger to the trust, could be legally charged only upon a showing that it had received trust property under such circumstances and with such knowledge or charged with such notice as would make it guilty of participation in wrongful dissipation of the trust property. Without some such averment it does not become a trustee of its own tort. Obviously, the first several lines of the first paragraph do not state a cause of action against appellee; for they are merely an assertion that appellants had seen certain letters of the trustee admitting that he had mingled trust funds with those of appellee. This averment in itself binds appellee in no way. The remaining lines allege merely that the proceeds of certain checks payable to the trustee "were paid into the treasury of Eastern Viavi Company, a corporation" and that, thereby, that company charged itself as a trustee de son tort. The latter clause, of course, is a conclusion of law. Nothing in the two paragraphs constitute a charge of misconduct on the part of defendant.
At the risk of undue prolixity, we refer to rules elementary in character and ancient in procedural law, but retained in modern practice. Under Rule 12(b) of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S. C.A. following section 723c, failure to state a complaint upon which relief can be granted can result only in allowance of a motion to dismiss. No claim for relief is stated if the complaint pleads facts insufficient to show that a legal wrong has been committed, or omits an averment necessary to establish the wrong or fails so to link the parties with the wrong as to entitle the plaintiff to redress. United States v. Fuller Co., 8 Cir., 14 F.2d 813. In suits charging misapplication of trust funds and demanding accounting, the complaint, to be sufficient, must set out particularly all facts necessary to constitute a cause of action. If fraudulent conduct is relied upon, general charges are not sufficient, but the facts averred must be sufficient on their face to disclose that the conduct complained of was, in fact, the result of bad faith. Ruwitch v. Frankel, 7 Cir., 68 F.2d 52, 53, and cases there cited.
Not every recipient of a check or other negotiable instrument from a trustee or through a...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Folse v. McCuskey
...Inc., 263 F.Supp. 635, 646 (N.D. W.Va. 1967); Jackson v. Nelson, 405 F.2d 872, 873 (9th Cir. 1968) (per curiam); Sutton v. E. Viavi Co., 138 F.2d 959, 960 (7th Cir. 1943); Stewart v. Hevelone, 283 F.Supp. 842, 846 (D. Neb. 1968); Huey v. Barloga, 277 F.Supp. 864, 871 (N.D. Ill. 1967)).) All......
-
Fass v. Nowsco Well Service, Ltd.
...of action. 263 F.Supp. at 647. See also Glenn Coal Co. v. Dickinson Fuel Co., 72 F.2d 885, 888 (4th Cir.1934). In Sutton v. Eastern Viavi Co., 138 F.2d 959 (7th Cir.1943), the court ruled that no claim for relief is stated if the complaint pleads facts insufficient to demonstrate that a leg......
-
Keach v. U.S. Trust Co. N.A.
...§ 462.6, citing Heller v. Jonathan Investments, Inc., 113 Ill.2d 60, 99 Ill.Dec. 142, 495 N.E.2d 589 (Ill.1986); Sutton v. Eastern Viavi Co., 138 F.2d 959, 961 (7th Cir.1943). Although neither comparison is perfect when applied to the present context, the Court finds that under the federal ......
-
Strickland v. HOLIDAY RV SUPERSTORES, INC.
...to redress. Therefore, the complaint fails to state a cause of action and should be dismissed. See generally Sutton v. Eastern Viavi, Co., 138 F.2d 959, 960 (7th Cir.1943). See also Stewart v. Hevelone, 283 F.Supp. 842, 843 This Court has recently received a motion for declaratory and summa......