Swanson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Decision Date | 16 December 1935 |
Docket Number | No. 108,108 |
Citation | 80 L.Ed. 273,296 U.S. 362,56 S.Ct. 283 |
Parties | SWANSON et al. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Mr. Arnold R. Baar, of Chicago, Ill., for petitioner.
The Attorney General and James W. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.
The question presented is whether the income of the 'Lake View Land Association' for the years 1925 and 1926 was subject to tax as the income of a trust under section 219 of the Revenue Act of 1926,1 or as the income of an 'association' by virtue of section 2(a)(2) of that act.2 The Circuit Court of Appeals held the taxpayer to be an 'association' and affirmed the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals to that effect. 76 f.(2d) 651, 652. This Court granted a writ of certiorari. See Morrissey v. Commissioner, 296 U.S. 344, 56 S.Ct. 289, 80 L.Ed. 263, decided this day.
The material facts as found by the Board of Tax Appeals are as follows: Joseph E. Swanson and Ralph C. Otis, in 1914, acquired a piece of vacant land in the city of Chicago with the view of improving it by the erection of an apartment house, the title being taken by Swanson. An apartment house was built. Subsequently, in 1915, at the suggestion of their attorney, they entered into a trust agreement for the purpose of carrying the title to the property. The trust was designated as the 'Lake View Land Association.' The first trustees were Ralph C. Otis, Joseph E. Swanson, and Allen G. Mills. Petitioners set forth the following summary of the trust agreement, taken from the opinion of the Circuit Court of Appeals:
'Under the trust agreement, the trustees were given the complete management and control of the property, to exchange, reconstruct, remodel, sell, or improve at their discretion or to borrow money secured by the property. They were authorized to rent suitable quarters for the transaction of the business of the trust and employ such assistants as they required. The agreement provided for the issuance of
The Court of...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Larson v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue
...giving effect to the intent of the Congress as embodied in those laws. Morrissey v. Commissioner, 296 U.S. 344 (1935); Swanson v. Commissioner, 296 U.S. 362 (1935); Helvering v. Combs, 296 U.S. 365 (1935); Helvering v. Coleman-Gilbert Associates, 296 U.S. 369 (1935). The principles to be co......
- Toucey v. New York Life Ins Co Phoenix Finance Corporation v. Bridge Co
-
State St. Trust Co. v. Hall
...72 L.Ed. 978;Morrissey v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 296 U.S. 344, 56 S.Ct. 289, 80 L.Ed. 263;Swanson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 296 U.S. 362, 56 S.Ct. 283, 80 L.Ed. 273;Helvering v. Combs, 296 U.S. 365, 56 S.Ct. 287, 80 L.Ed. 275;Helvering v. Coleman-Gilbert Associates, 29......
-
Fidelity-Bankers Trust Co. v. Helvering
...Note (1932) 42 Yale L.J. 270. 14 Morrissey v. Commissioner, 1935, 296 U.S. 344, 56 S.Ct. 289, 80 L.Ed. 263; Swanson v. Commissioner, 1935, 296 U. S. 362, 56 S.Ct. 283, 80 L.Ed. 273; Helvering v. Combs, 1935, 296 U.S. 365, 56 S.Ct. 287, 80 L.Ed. 275; Helvering v. Coleman-Gilbert Associates, ......
-
Tax Court In Brief | Fairbank V. Comm'r | Reporting Obligations For Foreign Trust Income And Ownership; Statute Of Limitations
...of the arrangement are its "nature," "purpose," and "operations," with weight given to organizing documents. See Swanson v. Commissioner, 296 U.S. 362, 365 (1935); Morrissey v. Commissioner, 296 U.S. 344, 357 (1935). The "parties are not at liberty to say that their purpose was other or nar......
-
Classification of entities for tax purposes; just "check the box."
...of life as a relevant factor. Regs. 86, art. 801-4 (1935). (7) Morrisey v. Commissioner, 296 U.S. 344 (1935); Swanson v. Commissioner, 296 U.S. 362 (1935); Helvering v. Combs, 296 U.S. 365 (1935); Helvering v. Coleman-Gilbert Associates, 296 U.S. 369 (8) Morrisey, 296 U.S. at 356, 359-360. ......