Swanson v. Leavens
| Decision Date | 19 November 1894 |
| Parties | SWANSON et al. v. LEAVENS. |
| Court | Oregon Supreme Court |
Appeal from circuit court, Multnomah county.
Action by Peter and Charles Swanson against J.M. Leavens. Judgment for plaintiffs, from which defendant appealed, but failed to file a printed abstract of the record, or have the time for so doing extended. Respondents move to affirm the judgment. Affirmed.
W.W. Page, for appellants.
C.A. Moore, for respondents.
To continue reading
Request your trial
6 cases
-
Reynolds v. Jackson County
...dispatch of its business, yet, unless a good reason exists for such default, we cannot set them aside or disregard them. Swanson v. Leavens, 26 Or. 561, 40 P. 230; v. Close, 28 Or. 108, 42 P. 128; Neppach v. Jones, 28 Or. 286, 39 P. 999, and 42 P. 519. The exculpatory facts relied upon do n......
-
Berg v. Goldstone
...tendering to excuse such neglect. This appeal will therefore be dismissed, and the judgment of the lower court affirmed. Swanson v. Leavens, 26 Or. 561, 40 P. 230; v. Close, 28 Or. 108, 42 P. 128; and Van Tassell v. Jefferson County, 90 Or. 600, 177 P. 955. ...
-
Yamhill Sanitary Public Market Co. v. Strowbridge
... ... 81] failure. No reason has been assigned or ... excuse given for the neglect ... Upon ... the anthority of Swanson v. Leavens, 26 Or. 561, 40 ... P. 230, Close v. Close, 28 Or. 108, 42 P. 128, and ... Morrison v. Hall, 55 Or. 243, 104 P. 963, the ... ...
-
Morrison v. Hall
... ... 571, 91 P. viii) and ... for a noncompliance with this rule the judgment appealed from ... may be affirmed or dismissed. Swanson v. Leavens, 26 ... Or. 561, 40 P. 230; Close v. Close, 28 Or. 108, 42 ... P. 128. The default is admitted, and in extenuation it is ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results