Swanson & Youngdale, Inc. v. Seagrave Corp., 76-1511
| Decision Date | 12 October 1976 |
| Docket Number | No. 76-1511,76-1511 |
| Parties | SWANSON & YOUNGDALE, INC., Appellee, v. SEAGRAVE CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, Appellant. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit |
Charles Quaintance, Jr., Minneapolis, Minn., filed brief for appellant.
George C. King, St. Paul, Minn., filed brief for appellee.
Before HEANEY, STEPHENSON and HENLEY, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
Upon the Court's own motion and pursuant to Rule 9(a), the appeal is dismissed. This Court is without jurisdiction to hear appeals from a decision of a United States Magistrate. See Reciprocal Exchange v. Noland, --- F.2d ---- (8th Cir. 1976); United States v. Haley, 541 F.2d 678 (8th Cir. 1974); 9 J. Moore, Federal Practice P 110.01 (2d ed. 1973).
To continue reading
Request your trial
6 cases
-
Sick v. City of Buffalo, N. Y.
...v. Reeds, 552 F.2d 170, 171 (7th Cir. 1977) (per curiam); McCall v. Cudd, 544 F.2d 934 (8th Cir. 1976); Swanson & Youngdale, Inc. v. Seagrave Corp. 542 F.2d 1008 (8th Cir. 1976); Reciprocal Exchange v. Noland, 542 F.2d 462, 463 (8th Cir. 1976); United States v. Haley, 541 F.2d 678 (8th Cir.......
-
Harding v. Kurco, Inc.
...Engineers, Local 406, 572 F.2d 1031 (5th Cir. 1978); Taylor v. Oxford, 575 F.2d 152 (7th Cir. 1978); Swanson & Youngdale, Inc. v. Seagrave Corp., 542 F.2d 1008 (8th Cir. 1976). The Federal Magistrates Act authorizes district courts to assign magistrates only such "additional duties" as are ......
- Jimerson v. Kisco Co., Inc., 76-1030
-
Swanson & Youngdale, Inc. v. Seagrave Corp.
...Court from the Magistrate's judgment was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction on the Court's own motion. Swanson & Youngdale, Inc. v. Seagrave Corporation, 542 F.2d 1008 (8th Cir. 1976). 3 The Magistrate then forwarded a memorandum and his findings of fact and conclusions of law to Judge Dona......
Request a trial to view additional results