Swift Chemical Co. v. Usamex Fertilizers, 80-3560
Decision Date | 28 April 1981 |
Docket Number | No. 80-3560,80-3560 |
Citation | 646 F.2d 1121 |
Parties | SWIFT CHEMICAL COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. USAMEX FERTILIZERS, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellants. USAMEX FERTILIZERS, INC., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SWIFT AGRICULTURAL CHEMICAL CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. . Unit A |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, Morey L. Sear, Judge.
J. William Vaudry, Jr., New Orleans, La., Bill, Durkee, Michael O. Sutton, Walter R. Brookhart, Houston, Tex., for defendants-appellants.
Jerry A. Brown, Richard W. Bussoff, New Orleans, La., John W. Hofeldt, Rolf O. Stadheim, Arthur R. Curtis, Chicago, Ill., Monroe & Lemann, New Orleans, La., for Swift Agricultural Chemical Corp.
Before THORNBERRY, COLEMAN and AINSWORTH, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed on the basis of the opinion of District Judge Morey L. Sear, 490 F.Supp. 1343 (E.D.La.1980).
AFFIRMED.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
EI Du Pont De Nemours v. Phillips Pet. Co.
...to obtain lower results. Swift Chemical Co. v. Usamex Fertilizer, Inc., 490 F.Supp. 1343, 1354 (E.D.La.1980), affirmed per curiam, 646 F.2d 1121 (5th Cir.1981); Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. v. Texon, Inc., 268 F.2d 839, 841-42 (1st Cir.1959). When comonomer content is determined by the method ......
-
Amerace Corp. v. Ferro Corp.
...of issuance and another at a later date, Swift Chemical Co. v. Usamex Fertilizers, Inc., 490 F.Supp. 1343 (E.D.La.1980), aff'd 646 F.2d 1121 (5th Cir. 1981). 21. One additional factor, albeit not determinative, supports the Court's holding that the '327 patent is not invalid for insufficien......
-
Miller v. Cudahy Co., Civ. A. No. 77-1212.
...part, 788 F.2d 918 (3rd Cir.1986); Swift Chemical Co. v. Usamex Fertilizers, Inc., 490 F.Supp. 1343, 1350-51 (E.D.La.1980), aff'd, 646 F.2d 1121 (5th Cir.1981), rehearing denied, 650 F.2d 282 (5th Cir.1981); Wilson v. Fonte, 82 F.R.D. 632, 634 (E.D. The law is well settled that to reopen tr......
-
Villescas v. Abraham
...of grievous wrong evoked by new and unforeseen conditions." 47 AM. JUR. Judgments § 847, citing, e.g., Swift Chemical Co. v. Usamex Fertilizers, Inc., 646 F.2d 1121 (5th Cir. 1981). "Thus, modification is to be granted cautiously, and only where there is a showing of changed circumstances r......