Swinea v. City of Florence
| Decision Date | 04 October 1938 |
| Docket Number | 8 Div. 637. |
| Parties | SWINEA v. CITY OF FLORENCE. |
| Court | Alabama Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Law and Equity Court, Lauderdale County; Robert M. Hill, Judge.
J. Claude Swinea was convicted of violating an ordinance of the City of Florence, and he appeals.
Affirmed.
Henry D. Jones, of Florence, for appellant.
Orlan B. Hill, Jr., of Florence, for appellee.
Supreme Court Rule One requires assignments of error to be written upon the transcript. There is no such assignment of error in this case. In the absence of such assignment of error the judgment must be affirmed. Williams v. Ensley Motor Co., 19 Ala.App. 57, 94 So. 612; Nichols v. Hardegree, 202 Ala. 132, 79 So. 598; Kinnon v. Louisville & N. R. Co., 187 Ala. 480, 65 So. 397. Cases of this character do not come under the influence of Section 3258 of the Code of 1923.
The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Parks v. City of Montgomery
...assignments of error, Perry v. State, supra; Casteel v. City of Decatur, supra; Gentle v. City of Huntsville, supra; Swinea v. City of Florence, 28 Ala.App. 332, 183 So. 686; Griffith v. City of Birmingham, supra, but are governed by the rules applicable to civil appeals. Casteel v. City of......
-
Sisson v. Pruitt
... ... the evidence will not be reviewed. City Cleaning Co. v ... Birmingham Waterworks Co., 204 Ala. 51, 85 So. 291; ... Johnston Bros. et al ... ...