Swineford v. Franklin Cnty.

CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of Missouri
Writing for the CourtSHERWOOD
Citation73 Mo. 279
PartiesSWINEFORD et al., Appellants, v. FRANKLIN COUNTY.
Decision Date31 October 1880
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
19 practice notes
  • Zoll v. St. Louis County, No. 34970.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Missouri
    • 8 Febrero 1939
    ...as to the proper performance of its duty." It was ruled that the demurrer was properly sustained. Swineford et al. v. Franklin County, 73 Mo. 279, was an action for consequential damages resulting from the action of the county court in causing to be filled up a millrace in order to prevent ......
  • Bd. of Com'rs of Jasper Cnty. v. Allman
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court of Indiana
    • 25 Noviembre 1895
    ...v. Pulaski Co., 26 Ark. 37;Downing v. Mason Co., 87 Ky. 208, 8 S. W. 264;Reardon v. St. Louis Co., 36 Mo. 555;Swineford v. Franklin Co., 73 Mo. 279;Clark v. Adair Co., 79 Mo. 536;Gilman v. Contra Costa Co., 8 Cal. 52;Id., 68 Am. Dec. 290, and note on pages 294 and 295; Barnett v. Contra Cos......
  • Board of Commissioners of Jasper County v. Allman, 17,386
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court of Indiana
    • 25 Noviembre 1895
    ...v. Mason County, 87 Ky. 208, 12 Am. St. Rep. 437, 8 S.W. 264; Reardon v. St. Louis County, 36 Mo. 555; Swineford v. Franklin County, 73 Mo. 279; Clark v. Adair County, 79 Mo. 536; Gilman v. County of Contra Costa, 8 Cal. 52, 68 Am. Dec. 290, and note on pages 294 and 295; Barnett v. County ......
  • Tritz v. City of Kansas
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Missouri
    • 31 Octubre 1884
    ...it liable that this duty may be imposed upon its common council. Reardon v. St. Louis County, 36 Mo. 555; Swinfield v. Franklin County, 73 Mo. 279, and 6 Mo. App. 39; Tranter v. City of Sacramento, 61 Cal. 271; Winbiggler v. City of Los Angeles, 45 Cal. 36. Dillon on Mun. Corp. (3 Ed.) sect......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
19 cases
  • Zoll v. St. Louis County, No. 34970.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Missouri
    • 8 Febrero 1939
    ...as to the proper performance of its duty." It was ruled that the demurrer was properly sustained. Swineford et al. v. Franklin County, 73 Mo. 279, was an action for consequential damages resulting from the action of the county court in causing to be filled up a millrace in order to prevent ......
  • Bd. of Com'rs of Jasper Cnty. v. Allman
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court of Indiana
    • 25 Noviembre 1895
    ...v. Pulaski Co., 26 Ark. 37;Downing v. Mason Co., 87 Ky. 208, 8 S. W. 264;Reardon v. St. Louis Co., 36 Mo. 555;Swineford v. Franklin Co., 73 Mo. 279;Clark v. Adair Co., 79 Mo. 536;Gilman v. Contra Costa Co., 8 Cal. 52;Id., 68 Am. Dec. 290, and note on pages 294 and 295; Barnett v. Contra Cos......
  • Board of Commissioners of Jasper County v. Allman, 17,386
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court of Indiana
    • 25 Noviembre 1895
    ...v. Mason County, 87 Ky. 208, 12 Am. St. Rep. 437, 8 S.W. 264; Reardon v. St. Louis County, 36 Mo. 555; Swineford v. Franklin County, 73 Mo. 279; Clark v. Adair County, 79 Mo. 536; Gilman v. County of Contra Costa, 8 Cal. 52, 68 Am. Dec. 290, and note on pages 294 and 295; Barnett v. County ......
  • Tritz v. City of Kansas
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Missouri
    • 31 Octubre 1884
    ...it liable that this duty may be imposed upon its common council. Reardon v. St. Louis County, 36 Mo. 555; Swinfield v. Franklin County, 73 Mo. 279, and 6 Mo. App. 39; Tranter v. City of Sacramento, 61 Cal. 271; Winbiggler v. City of Los Angeles, 45 Cal. 36. Dillon on Mun. Corp. (3 Ed.) sect......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT