Syms v. Harmon.

Decision Date03 June 1948
CitationSyms v. Harmon., 134 Conn. 653, 60 A.2d 166 (Conn. 1948)
PartiesSYMS et al. v. HARMON.
CourtConnecticut Supreme Court

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Appeal from Superior Court, Hartford County; Quinlan, Judge.

Action by Odis Syms and another against Weston C. Harmon to recover damages for personal injuries to named plaintiff as the alleged result of defendant's negligence in driving an automobile.From a judgment on a jury's verdict for defendant and an order denying plaintiffs' motion to set aside the verdict, plaintiffs appeal.

No error.

Thomas J. Hagarty, of Hartford, (Robert L. Halloran, of Hartford, on the brief), for appellantAmerican Coal Co.

Cyril Coleman, of Hartford, for appellee.

Irving H. Rosenthal, of Bristol, for appellant.

Before MALTBIE, C. J., and BROWN, JENNINGS, ELLS and DICKENSON, JJ.

JENNINGS, Judge.

The defendant had a verdict in an action for damages resulting from personal injuries claimed to have been suffered by Syms as a result of the negligence of the defendant.The plaintiffs appeal from the denial of their motion to set aside the verdict and from the judgment.The appeal from the denial of the motion to set aside the verdict is not pursued in the brief otherwise than as the motion was based on claimed errors in the charge.The appeal will therefore be discussed solely upon the basis of these claims.

There was no serious dispute about the basic facts.Syms, hereinafter called the plaintiff, worked as a helper on a coal truck.The truck was double parked, facing west on Farmington Avenue in Hartford on a cold December afternoon.Traffic was...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
7 cases
  • State v. Gerak
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • August 5, 1975
    ...gains nothing by his general exception to the entire charge. Albrecht v. Rubinstein, 135 Conn. 243, 246, 63 A.2d 158; Syms v. Harmon, 134 Conn. 653, 657, 60 A.2d 166; Ladd v. Burdge, 132 Conn. 296, 297, 43 A.2d 752; Lebas v. Patriotic Assurance Co., 106 Conn. 119, 122, 137 A. 241. Exception......
  • Kelleher v. Smith
    • United States
    • Circuit Court of Connecticut. Connecticut Circuit Court, Appellate Division
    • April 4, 1969
    ...252 of the Practice Book, the pertinent provisions of which are quoted in the footnote. 1 See Practice Book § 800. In Syms v. Harmon, 134 Conn. 653, 656, 60 A.2d 166, 167, our Supreme Court, speaking of what is now Practice Book § 250, ruled as follows: 'The purpose of these requirements is......
  • Albrecht v. Rubinstein.
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • December 2, 1948
    ...Lebas v. Patriotic Assurance Co., 106 Conn. 119, 122, 137 A. 241; Ladd v. Burdge, 132 Conn. 296, 297, 43 A.2d 752; Syms v. Harmon, 134 Conn. 653, 657, 60 A.2d 166. The assignments requesting corrections of the finding could be used in this case only to present claimed errors in the charge. ......
  • Walczak v. Daniel
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • July 18, 1961
    ...to claims actually made on the trial. It is not required to deal specifically with those which might have been made. Syms v. Harmon, 134 Conn. 653, 656, 60 A.2d 166. It is for that reason that the rule contemplates that a request to charge will be given to the court before the commencement ......
  • Get Started for Free