Synthes, Inc. v. Emerge Med., Inc.
Decision Date | 05 June 2014 |
Docket Number | Civil Action No. 11–1566. |
Citation | 25 F.Supp.3d 617 |
Parties | SYNTHES, INC., Synthes USA HQ, Inc., Synthes USA, LLC, Synthes USA Sales, LLC, and Synthes USA Products, LLC, Plaintiffs, v. EMERGE MEDICAL, INC., John P. Marotta, Zachary W. Stassen, Eric Brown, and Charles Q. Powell, Defendants. Emerge Medical, Inc., Counterclaim–Plaintiff, v. Synthes, Inc., Synthes UUS HQ, Inc. Synthes USA, LLC, Synthes USA Sales, LLC, and Synthes USA Products, LLC, Counterclaim–Defendants. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
SYNTHES, INC., Synthes USA HQ, Inc., Synthes USA, LLC, Synthes USA Sales, LLC, and Synthes USA Products, LLC, Plaintiffs,
v.
EMERGE MEDICAL, INC., John P. Marotta, Zachary W. Stassen, Eric Brown, and Charles Q. Powell, Defendants.
Emerge Medical, Inc., Counterclaim–Plaintiff,
v.
Synthes, Inc., Synthes UUS HQ, Inc. Synthes USA, LLC, Synthes USA Sales, LLC, and Synthes USA Products, LLC, Counterclaim–Defendants.
Civil Action No. 11–1566.
United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.
Signed June 5, 2014
Motions granted in part and denied in part.
[25 F.Supp.3d 628]
Anthony B. Haller, Kevin M. Passerini, Michael P. Broadhurst, Rosemary McKenna, Blank Rome LLP, Philadelphia, PA, Edward N. Cahn, Blank Rome, LLP, Allentown, PA, for Plaintiffs.
Alex G. Romain, Daniel Dockery, Enu Mainigi, Jennifer Wicht, Williams & Connolly LLP, Washington, DC, Andrew C.S. Efaw, Sean G. Saxon, Wheeler Trigg & O'Donnell LLP, Denver, CO, Anne R. Myers, Eileen Monaghan Ficaro, Gregory F. Brown, Irina Volk Rabovetsky, Anna M. Darpino, Kaufman Dolowich & Voluck LLP, Blue Bell, PA, David P. Helwig, Marks O'Neill O'Brien & Courtney, Pittsburgh, PA, Benjamin J. Tursi, Marks O'Neill O'Brien Doherty & Kelly PC, Philadelphia, PA, John P. McShea, McShea Law Firm PC, Philadelphia, PA, for Defendants.
BUCKWALTER, District Judge.
TABLE OF CONTENTS FOR CROSS–MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT TO LIABILITY |
I. | STATEMENT OF FACTS | 630 |
A. | Persons Relevant to the Suit | 631 |
1. | The Parties | 631 |
2. | Other Relevant Individuals | 633 |
B. | Background of the Key Players' Employment With Synthes | 634 |
1. | Defendant Marotta's Employment With Synthes | 634 |
2. | Defendant Brown's Employment With Synthes | 636 |
3. | Powell's Employment With Synthes | 637 |
4. | Trafka's Employment with Synthes and Magnum Tool | 639 |
C. | Written Obligations of the Parties and Other Individuals | 640 |
1. | Synthes Written Obligations | 640 |
a. | Contractual Obligations | 640 |
b. | Employment Policies and Obligations | 645 |
2. | Emerge's Written Contracts and Policies | 645 |
3. | Vendors' Written Contractual Obligations to Synthes | 646 |
4. | SIMS and Customers' Written Contractual Obligations to Synthes | 647 |
D. | The Formation of Emerge Prior to April 15, 2010 | 647 |
1. | Brief Background of Emerge | 647 |
2. | Detailed Timeline of Emerge–Related Activities Prior to April 15, 2010 | 648 |
3. | Emerge's Business Plans and Investor Materials (Pre–April 2010) | 652 |
a. | The Private Placement Memorandum | 652 |
b. | Investor Presentations | 653 |
c. | Additional Statements Regarding Emerge's Business Model | 653 |
4. | Emerge's Finding of Investors and Raising Money | 653 |
5. | Early Design and Development of Emerge Product | 654 |
E. | Emerge's Use of Synthes Products and Information | 655 |
1. | Acquisition and Use of Synthes Product | 655 |
2. | Acquisition, Use, and Disclosure of Synthes's Confidential and Proprietary Information | 655 |
a. | Information Related to Synthes's Manufacturing Costs | 655 |
b. | Information Related to Synthes' External Fixation and LCP Products | 656 |
c. | Information Related to Synthes's Critical Features, Dimensions, and Tolerances | 656 |
d. | Information Related to Synthes's Engineering Specifications | 657 |
e. | Information Related to Synthes's Cortical and Cancellous Screws | 657 |
f. | Information Related to Synthes's Usage Data in Emerge's Early Accounts | 658 |
g. | Information Related to Synthes's Cannulated Screw Comparison Chart | 658 |
h. | Synthes Documents Marotta Emailed to His Personal Email Address | 658 |
i. | Marotta's & Powell's Retention of Synthes's Emails | 659 |
j. | Information Related to Synthes's Strategic Business Acquisition Discussions | 659 |
F. | Emerge Obtains FDA Clearance | 659 |
G. | Emerge's Pilot Customers | 660 |
1. | Banner Health | 660 |
2. | AOSH/USPI | 661 |
3. | Catholic Healthcare West | 662 |
4. | Other System–Wide Sales and Early Targets | 662 |
H. | Emerge's Sales Process, Strategy, Implementation, and Commingling of Product | 662 |
I. | Cardinal Health | 664 |
J. | Procedural History | 665 |
II. | STANDARD OF REVIEW | 665 |
III. | DISCUSSION | 666 |
A. | Claim Against Marotta for Breach of Fiduciary Duty (Count I) | 666 |
1. | Defendant's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Breach of Fiduciary Duty | 668 |
2. | Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment on Breach of Fiduciary Duty | 670 |
B. | Claim of Aiding and Abetting Breach of Fiduciary Duty Against Emerge | 674 |
C. | Claim Against Marotta for Breach of Contract Under the Non– Competition and Non–Disclosure Agreements (Count II) | 678 |
1. | The Assignment Provision of the Non–Disclosure Agreement | 678 |
2. | The Non–Competition and Non–Solicitation Provisions of the RM NCA | 684 |
a. | Breach of the Non–Competition Provision | 685 |
b. | Breach of the Non–Solicitation of Customers Provision | 689 |
c. | Breach of the Non–Solicitation of Employees Provision | 691 |
3. | Sales Consultant Non–Competition Provision | 693 |
4. | Return of Property Provision and Confidentiality and Non– Disclosure Provisions in the RM NCA and NDA | 698 |
a. | Small Fragment Set | 699 |
b. | Synthes Product in Marotta's Garage | 701 |
c. | Synthes Emails | 703 |
D. | Misappropriation | 704 |
1. | Whether the Items at Issue Constituted Trade Secrets | 705 |
a. | Synthes Information Regarding Manufacturing Costs and Usage Data | 705 |
b. | Product Design Information | 707 |
2. | Whether Emerge Misappropriated Synthes's Trade Secrets | 710 |
a. | Information Regarding Manufacturing Costs and Usage Data | 710 |
b. | Synthes Product Drawings and Information Related to External Fixation Products | 712 |
c. | Synthes Product Drawings and Information Related to Critical Features, Dimensions, and Tolerances for Screws Emerge Developed and Screws Emerge Identified as Additional Product Offerings | 712 |
d. | Synthes Engineering Specifications and Information Related to Products Emerge Designed and Identified as Additional Product Offerings | 713 |
e. | Drawings and Information Related to Synthes Cortical and Cancellous Screws and Product Emerge Identified as Additional Product Offerings | 714 |
f. | Strategic Business Planning Information Related to Companies Affiliated with Prospective Emerge Investors and Advisors | 715 |
3. | Conclusion as to Misappropriation | 715 |
E. | False Advertising Under the Lanham Act | 715 |
F. | Computer Fraud and Abuse Act | 718 |
G. | Trespass to Chattels | 721 |
H. | Fraud | 723 |
I. | Tortious Interference With Contract | 727 |
1. | Tortious Interference with Marotta's Contracts With Synthes | 727 |
a. | Whether Emerge Had Knowledge of Marotta's Contractual Agreements with Synthes | 728 |
b. | Whether Emerge Did Anything to Induce Marotta to Breach Either His NDA, His RM NCA, or His SC NCA With Synthes | 729 |
2. | Tortious Interference with Powell's Non–Compete Agreement With Synthes | 731 |
3. | Tortious Interference With Brown's Agreements With Synthes | 733 |
4. | Tortious Interference With Synthes's Contractual Relationships With Any of Its Customers or Vendors | 734 |
a. | Tortious Interference With Vendors | 734 |
b. | Tortious Interference with Customers | 735 |
5. | Marotta's Tortious Interference With Synthes's Contractual Relations With Other Synthes Employees | 735 |
J. | Civil Conspiracy | 735 |
IV. | CONCLUSION | 737 |
[25 F.Supp.3d 630]
Currently pending before the Court are the Cross-motions for Summary Judgment of Plaintiffs Synthes, Inc., Synthes USA HQ, Inc., Synthes USA, LLC, Synthes USA Sales, LLC, and Synthes USA Products, LLC (collectively “Synthes”) and Defendants Emerge Medical, Inc., John P. Marotta, and Charles Q. Powell (collectively “Defendants”). For the following reasons, Synthes's Motion is granted in part and denied in part and Defendants' Motion is granted in part and denied in part.
I. STATEMENT OF FACTS1The factual history of this case, while not particularly long in a temporal sense,
[25 F.Supp.3d 631]
contains numerous discrete events and actions that give rise to the multitude of claims at issue. As the parties have already engaged in lengthy motion practice, as well as a preliminary injunction hearing, the general facts are well-known to both the parties and the Court. While the Court declines to recite every fact set forth by the parties, the Court will engage in a somewhat detailed summary in order to encompass the facts pertinent to resolution of the motions at issue.2
A. Persons Relevant to the SuitSynthes, Inc. is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Pennsylvania, and is the parent company of the other Plaintiffs, which are also Delaware entities with their principal places of business in Pennsylvania. (Plaintiffs' Statement of Undisputed Facts (“PSUF”) ¶ 1; Defendants' Response to Plaintiffs' Statement (“DRPS”) ¶ 1.) Synthes has been described as a global leader in the highly competitive orthopedic device market. (PSUF ¶ 2; DRPS ¶ 2.) Its sales and marketing plan depends exclusively upon the preferences of orthopedic surgeons to influence the purchasing decisions of the hospitals and surgical centers where orthopedic surgeons practice. (PSUF ¶ 5;DRPS ¶ 5.)
Emerge Medical, Inc. (“Emerge”) is a Colorado corporation formed on January 13, 2010, under the name Emerge Surgical, Inc. (PSUF ¶ 7; DRPS ¶ 7.) On June 23, 2010, Emerge Surgical, Inc. officially changed its name to Emerge Medical, Inc. (PSUF ¶ 8; DRPS ¶ 8.) Emerge competes with Synthes and was formed to produce and sell Generic Device Fixation Hardware “similar, but not identical to” that which Synthes also produces and sells. (PSUF ¶¶ 9–10; DRPS ¶¶ 9–10.) According to Emerge, it has “devised a new approach to the sales of [drill bits, guide wires, and screws] providing the American public with a like-numbered product that is similar to” drill bits, guide wires, and cannulated screws sold by Synthes. (PSUF ¶ 11; DRPS ¶ 11.) As of July 2012, Emerge sold only “drill bits, guide wires, and screws.” (PSUF ¶ 12; DRPS ¶ 12.) Emerge's drill bits, guide...
To continue reading
Request your trialUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Synthes, Inc. v. Emerge Med., Inc., Civil Action No. 11–1566.
...25 F.Supp.3d 617SYNTHES, INC., Synthes USA HQ, Inc., Synthes USA, LLC, Synthes USA Sales, LLC, and Synthes USA Products, LLC, Plaintiffsv.EMERGE MEDICAL, INC., John P. Marotta, Zachary W. Stassen, Eric Brown, and Charles Q. Powell, Defendants.Emerge Medical, Inc., Counterclaim–Plaintiffv.Sy......
-
Kivett v. Neopharma, Inc.
... ... must be regarded as a tort." Id.While the applicability of the doctrine is a matter of law, Synthes, Inc. v. Emerge Med., Inc., 25 F. Supp. 3d 617, 724 (E.D. Pa. 2014), the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ... ...
-
Arnold's Office Furniture LLC v. Borden
... ... law.” Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 ... U.S. 242, 248 (1986). A factual dispute is ... motions pending.” Synthes, Inc. v. Emerge Med., ... Inc., 25 F.Supp.3d 617, 666 ... ...