T-Bone Feeders, Inc. v. Martin, T-BONE

• Court: United States State Supreme Court of Kansas
• Citation: 236 Kan. 641,693 P.2d 1187
• Decision Date: 26 January 1985
• Docket Number: No. 56739,T-BONE,56739
• Parties: FEEDERS, INC., and J & J Feeders, Inc., Applicants, and Kansas Livestock Association, Intervenor, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Philip W. MARTIN, Director, Division of Property Valuation of the State of Kansas; Harley T. Duncan, Secretary of Revenue, State of Kansas; and Board of County Commissioners, Sherman County, Kansas, Defendants-Appellees.

Page 1187

693 P.2d 1187 236 Kan. 641 T-BONE FEEDERS, INC., and J & J Feeders, Inc., Applicants,
and
Kansas Livestock Association, Intervenor, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Philip W. MARTIN, Director, Division of Property Valuation
of the State of Kansas; Harley T. Duncan, Secretary of
Revenue, State of Kansas; and Board of County
Commissioners, Sherman County, Kansas, Defendants-Appellees. No. 56739. Supreme Court of Kansas. Jan. 26, 1985.

Page 1188

Syllabus by the Court

Machinery and equipment used in a commercial feedlot operation are not personal property used exclusively in farming or ranching operations and are not included within the exemption from property or ad valorem taxes provided under K.S.A. 1982 Supp. 79-201j.

Wilbur G. Leonard, Topeka, argued the cause and was on briefs for appellants.

Carol B. Bonebrake, Kansas Department of Revenue, Topeka, argued the cause and was on brief for appellees, Philip W. Martin and Harley T. Duncan.

F.L. McGinley, Goodland, was on the brief for appellee, Board of County Com'rs.

PRAGER, Justice:

This is an administrative appeal from an order of the Board of Tax Appeals of the State of Kansas (BOTA) denying the claims of two corporate taxpayers for an exemption from taxation of certain personal property owned by them and used in the operation of their cattle feedlots. The district court of Shawnee County affirmed the order of BOTA, and the taxpayers then filed an appeal to this court. The taxpayers, appellants in this case, are T-Bone Feeders, Inc., and J & J Feeders, Inc., applicants for the exemption. The Kansas Livestock Association was permitted to intervene in the case in support of the taxpayers. The appellees participating in this appeal include Philip W. Martin, Director, Division of Property Valuation of the State of Kansas; Harley T. Duncan, Secretary of Revenue; and the Board of County Commissioners of Sherman County. They will be referred to as the taxing agencies.

The claim of exemption in this case was made by the taxpayers on the basis of K.S.A. 1982 Supp. 79-201i and 79-201j which [236 Kan. 642] were enacted in 1982. K.S.A. 1982

Page 1189

Supp. 79-201j provides an exemption from ad valorem taxation for farm machinery and equipment in the following language:

"79-201j. Property exempt from taxation; farm machinery and equipment. The following described property, to the extent specified by this section, shall be exempt from all property or ad valorem taxes levied under the laws of the state of Kansas:

"All farm machinery and equipment. The term 'farm machinery and equipment' means that personal property actually and regularly used exclusively in farming or ranching operations. The term 'farm machinery and equipment' shall not include any passenger vehicle, truck, truck tractor, trailer, semitrailer or pole trailer, other than a farm trailer, as the terms are defined by K.S.A. 8-126 and amendments thereto.

"The provisions of this section shall apply to all taxable years commencing after December 31, 1981." (Emphasis supplied.)

K.S.A. 1982 Supp. 79-201i, which was enacted along with 79-201j in Chapter 390, Laws of 1982, sets forth the legislative purpose of the tax exemption:

"79-201i. Purpose for farm machinery and equipment property tax exemption. It is the purpose of K.S.A.1982 Supp. 79-201j of this act to promote, stimulate and develop the general welfare, economic development and prosperity of the state of Kansas by fostering the growth and development of agricultural endeavors within the state. Agriculture, as conducted in farming and ranching operations throughout the state, is the primary basis of the Kansas economy. Communities, regions, and the state as a whole are materially dependent upon agricultural endeavors and derive substantial financial benefit from the success of Kansas agriculture. Farming and ranching operations require the investment of large sums of capital for the purpose of providing the land on which the operations are conducted, and the farm machinery and equipment necessary to satisfactorily carry out such endeavors. Because of agriculture's unique requirements of substantial capital investment, the property tax burden becomes a deterrent to such investment and, in some instances, an encouragement to farm and ranch abandonment. Kansas, and all its citizens, will benefit from any improvement in the economic environment of Kansas agriculture. The exemption from the ad valorem property tax of farm machinery and equipment actually and regularly used in farming and ranching operations will constitute an incentive to agriculture and will improve the general economy of the state. Considering this state's heavy reliance on agriculture, the enhancement of agricultural endeavors is deemed to be a public purpose which will promote the general welfare of the state and be for the benefit of the people of the state." (Emphasis supplied.)

In order to determine the question of exemption raised in this case, it is necessary to interpret the legislative intent as expressed in the two statutes set forth above and to apply the same [236 Kan. 643] to the undisputed factual circumstances present in this case. Simply stated they are as follows: T-Bone Feeders, Inc., and J & J Feeders, Inc. (the taxpayers) are separately engaged in the commercial feedlot business.

T-Bone Feeders, Inc., is a Kansas corporation, 97% owned by members of the House family, who are responsible for the management of the feedlot which has a capacity of 5,500 head. Recent occupancy varies from 3,700 to 4,200 head, of which approximately 70% are owned by the House family. In 1983 the family's cultivated farming operations included 6,030 acres owned by them and 3,840 acres leased from others, on which land they produced a substantial part of the grain and other foodstuffs fed to feedlot cattle.

J & J Feeders, Inc., is a Kansas corporation, wholly owned by John Cogswell who also owns and operates one hundred quarters (25 sections) of grassland on which he maintains an extensive cattle herd. The feedlot, near Goodland, has a capacity of 7,500 head, with an estimated break-even point of 3,500 head. From one-third to one-half of the cattle on feed are owned by

Page 1190

Mr. Cogswell, with the remainder belonging to other persons. The Cogswell pastures annually provide some 500 tons of hay for feedlot use. Grains and other foodstuffs are purchased from neighboring farmers.

The Kansas Livestock Association was permitted to intervene in the case before BOTA on behalf of the Kansas livestock industry and the cattle feedlots which are members of the association. It supported taxpayers' applications for exemption before BOTA and joins the taxpayers in this appeal.

The personal property for which exemption is claimed includes such items as grinders, loaders, tractors, dirt movers, sprayers, hay trailers, feed boxes and other equipment used in the feeding and maintenance of the cattle and the general upkeep of the feedlot facilities. Equipment and machinery used on farms and ranches are not involved in this case.

The physical facilities maintained by these taxpayers are typical of the feedlots operated throughout the state. Their sole purpose is to complete the final conditioning of beef animals, at the end of which period the cattle are shipped to nearby packers for slaughter and processing. Termed "feeder cattle," most animals are about two years old and weigh from 500 to 750 pounds [236 Kan. 644] when they enter the feedlots. They previously have been on grass, wheat pasture or other type of forage and usually have not been fed...