Tacoma Ry. & Power Co. v. Pierce County
Decision Date | 14 September 1910 |
Docket Number | 1,332,1,333.,1,331 |
Citation | 193 F. 90 |
Court | U.S. District Court — Western District of Washington |
Parties | TACOMA RY. & POWER CO. v. PIERCE COUNTY et al. PUGET SOUND POWER CO. v. SAME. OLD COLONY TRUST CO. v. SAME. |
On Petition for Rehearing, September 30, 1910.
James B. Howe and Hugh A. Tait, for complainant.
H. G Rowland, Dix H. Rowland, and R. M. Davis, for Pierce County and others.
C. M Riddell, J. W. Quick, C. E. Dunkleberger, and E. B. Brockway for City of Tacoma and others.
The gist of the complaints in these cases is alleged discrimination and unfairness in the assessment of property in Pierce county for taxation for the year 1907, which, if not corrected, will impose upon the Tacoma Railway & Power Company and the Puget Sound Power Company an undue proportion of the burden of taxation for state and municipal governments. The suits were commenced before the taxes for that year became due or payable, the object being to restrain the county officers from completing the tax roll as contemplated, but in the prolonged litigation the court has heard no application for a mandatory injunction to compel the officials to make a readjustment of values, or to list for taxation omitted property. The prayer for specific relief in the bill of complaint of the Tacoma Railway & Power Company is for a provisional injunction restraining the defendants from doing any further act to extend the tax complained of upon the assessment books and from doing any act to cloud the title, or to collect the alleged illegal tax during the pendency of the litigation, 'and that, upon the final hearing and determination of this cause, said illegal tax and the assessment upon which it is based be canceled, and the defendants required to enter the cancellation thereof upon said assessment books. ' In the body of the bill, however, the complainant declares its readiness and willingness to pay as soon as it is payable the tax upon all of its property as assessed, except any of the tax upon the arbitrary assessment of its franchises, and that it is ready and willing to pay, and will pay, any amount upon the value of its franchises which is fair and equitable. It is probable that, if the bill had not contained this offer or a declaration of similar import, the litigation would have been ended by the court sustaining a demurrer to the bill. As the issues have been framed, the controversy relates to alleged unfairness in the valuation placed upon the corporate franchises; and the litigation seems to have been conducted upon a theory that the court must, in order to decide the disputed question, make an appraisement of the relative value of said franchises corresponding to the valuation of all other property included in the assessment of property in Pierce county for the year 1907, and of all property in the county omitted from the assessment roll which should have been included, and take notice of undervaluations.
The briefs filed in behalf of the complainants admit that the value of the physical property of the Tacoma Railway & Power Company as shown by the company's books was $5,262,392.17, and the estimated value by three different methods of computation ranges from $5,836,780 to $3,727,230, and that the total value of all of its property, including franchises, per the assessment made for taxation, was $2,038,441, and that the Puget Sound Power Company's property, including its franchises, was assessed for taxation upon a valuation of $1,401,428. These admissions are to be considered in connection with the material facts which in the briefs complainant's counsel claims to have established by the evidence, which are as follows:
Northern Pacific Railway Company ............ $100,000 00
Tacoma Railway & Power Company ............... 895,280 00
Puget Sound Power Company .................... 934,728 00
Tacoma Eastern Railroad ....................... 25,000 00
Sunset Telephone Company ..................... 100,000 00
Pacific Traction Company ...................... 10,000 00
Seattle & Tacoma Railway Company ............. 119,605 00
Postal Telegraph & Cable Company ............... 6,270 00
Tacoma Industrial Company ...................... 1,000 00
Western Union Telegraph Company ............... 15,000 00
Ambrose Petrie Company ......................... 5,000 00
American District Telegraph Company ............ 6,000 00
Tacoma Gas Light Company ..................... 225,964 00
Syndicate Heat & Power Company ................... 800 00
Puget Sound Telephone Construction Company .... 10,000 00
Buckley Electric Company ......................... 300 00
Pacific Messenger Company ...................... 5,000 00
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Northern Pac. Ry. Co. v. Clearwater County
... ... v ... Guenther, 19 F. 395; Northern Pacific Ry. Co. v ... Pierce County, 77 Wash. 315, 137 P. 433; Louisville ... etc. R. Co. v. Bosworth, 209 F. 380, 452; ... of all the taxes assessed, or which should be assessed ... against him. ( Tacoma Ry. & Power Co. v. Pierce Co., ... (Wash.) 193 F. 90.) ... Courts ... of equity are ... ...
-
Phillips v. Board of Com'rs of Douglas County
...People ex rel. Strauss v. Purdy (Sup.Ct.) 167 N.Y.S. 66; People v. State Tax Commission (Sup.Ct.) 192 N.Y.S. 388; Tacoma Ry. & Power Co. v. Pierce County (C. C.) 193 F. 90. these decisions were under statutes similar to ours we do not pause to inquire, because the trial court in its ruling ......