TAIHEIYO CEMENT v. SC, S113759.

CourtUnited States State Supreme Court (California)
Citation77 P.3d 2,5 Cal.Rptr.3d 31
Decision Date24 September 2003
Docket NumberNo. S113759.,S113759.
PartiesTAIHEIYO CEMENT v. S.C. (Jeong).

5 Cal.Rptr.3d 31
77 P.3d 2

TAIHEIYO CEMENT
v.
S.C. (Jeong).

No. S113759.

Supreme Court of California.

September 24, 2003.


Matthew Edward Digby, Heidi Andrea Leider, Bingham McCutchen LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.

Scott Purington Nealey, Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, San Francisco, CA, David R. Markham, Blumental & Markham, La Jolla, CA, Haewon Shin, Attorney at Law, David Grosz, Fleishman, Fisher & Moest, Kenneth Taeho Haan, Attorney at Law, Christophe Kim, Lim, Ruger & Kim, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Bill Lann Lee, Lieff, Cabraser et al, San Francisco, CA, Barry A. Fisher, Fleishman & Fisher, Los Angeles, CA, for Real Party in Interest.

Prior report: Cal.App., 129 Cal.Rptr.2d 451.

Transferred to CA 2/8 after hold

The above-entitled review is hereby transferred to the Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Eight, with directions to vacate its decision and to reconsider the cause in light of American Ins. Ass'n v. Garamendi (2003) 539 U.S. 396, 123 S.Ct. 2374,156 L.Ed.2d 376.

GEORGE, C.J., and KENNARD, BAXTER, WERDEGAR, CHIN, and MORENO, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • People v. Martinez, S118180.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (California)
    • 24 d3 Setembro d3 2003
    ... 5 Cal.Rptr.3d 31 77 P.3d 2 PEOPLE v. MARTINEZ. No. S118180. Supreme Court of California. September 24, 2003. Attorney General—Sacramento Office, Sacramento, CA, for Plaintiff and Respondent. William D. Farber, Attorney at Law, San Rafael, CA, for Defendant and Appellant. Prior report: Cal.......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT