Talas v. Correct Piping Co., Inc., 2-680A193
| Docket Nº | No. 2-680A193 |
| Citation | 409 N.E.2d 1223 |
| Case Date | September 24, 1980 |
| Court | Court of Appeals of Indiana |
Page 1223
v.
CORRECT PIPING COMPANY, INC., Appellee-Defendant Below.
Page 1225
Michael R. Morow, Munster, Leonard M. Ring & Assoc., Chicago, Ill., for appellant.
Samuel J. Furlin, Spangler, Jennings, Spangler & Dougherty, P. C., Merrillville, for appellee.
ROBERTSON, Presiding Judge.
Woodrow Talas (Talas) was injured when he fell from some scaffolding during the course of his employment with Correct Piping Co., Inc. (Correct). As a result of this accident, Mr. Talas is now a traumatic quadriplegic. This appeal resulted from the denial by the Full Industrial Board of Indiana (Board) of Talas's emergency petition for additional care. We affirm.
The record reveals that Talas suffered his injury on June 25, 1978. Talas was in the hospital until August 3, 1978, at which time he was transferred to the Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, in Chicago, Illinois. Talas was released on January 19, 1979, although he still returns for check-ups. Talas received around-the-clock nursing care at his home from January 19, 1979, until June 16, 1979. Expenses for this care were paid by Correct's insurance carrier until May 13, 1979. Talas currently has a nurse's aid care for him at his home eight hours a day, and a licensed practical nurse who comes by his home on a bi-weekly basis. Talas testified that during the period in which he had continuous nursing care, his physical feelings and motions began to improve, but that now, since he only has an attendant for eight hours a day, his joints are getting stiffer and he's not able to function as well as before.
The Board approved a Form 12 agreement between Talas and Correct on April 6, 1979. That agreement listed the length of temporary disability as being June 26, 1978, through December 6, 1978. Further, the agreement declared that compensation was "based upon 100% permanent impairment of the man as a whole and 100% total permanent disability." The Form 12 agreement contained the further proviso that:
It is agreed that the injury is in a permanent and quiescent state. It is further agreed that the question of continuing treatment for the employee's injuries, including surgical hospital and nursing services and supplies, has not been agreed upon, and shall be left to the determination
Page 1226
of the Industrial Board upon proper hearing pursuant to the Workmen's Compensation Act of the State of Indiana.Talas filed his emergency petition for a hearing to determine Correct's liability for nursing care needed to sustain his life on September 21, 1979. A hearing was held on November 28, 1979, and the hearing officer's findings and order were issued December 21, 1979. This order recognized Talas's 100% total permanent disability, and that the Industrial Board may require the employer to furnish further treatment to limit or reduce the amount and extent of such impairment. The order directed Correct to pay and continue to pay "all the medical and nursing care needed by plaintiff as a result of his said accidental injury, in order to reduce his disability or impairment."
Correct filed for review by the full Board on December 28, 1979, and on May 22, 1980, the Board overruled the single hearing member's decision on the emergency petition, and directed that Talas take nothing by way of the petition.
On appeal, Talas argues that: continuing medical and nursing expenses were never agreed to by way of the Form 12 agreement, and that the issue was left open for a determination by the Industrial Board; he is not in a permanent and quiescent state for the purposes of the medical payments provisions of the Indiana Workmen's Compensation Act; medical payments should have been awarded under any of the four time periods set forth in the Act, and; the findings were insufficient in view of the uncontradicted evidence.
We note initially, the distinction between temporary total disability and permanent total disability. Temporary total disability involves the period immediately following the injury. During this period, the ability to return to work of the same kind or character is relevant to the workmen's compensation award. When the injury has reached a...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Talas v. Correct Piping Co., Inc., 381S52
...of Woodrow Talas, who sought review of the Court of Appeals' opinion found at Talas v. Correct Piping Co., Inc., (1980) Ind.App., 409 N.E.2d 1223. We have previously granted Talas's petition, vacated the opinion of the Court of Appeals, and twice remanded this cause to the Full Industrial B......
-
Talas v. Correct Piping Co., Inc., 381S52
...take nothing. The Court of Appeals, First District, affirmed in a unanimous opinion. Talas v. Correct Piping Co., (1980) Ind.App., 409 N.E.2d 1223. Transfer is now granted, and the decision and opinion of the Court of Appeals are hereby One issue before the Court of Appeals was whether or n......
-
Talas v. Correct Piping Co., Inc., 381S52
...of Woodrow Talas, who sought review of the Court of Appeals' opinion found at Talas v. Correct Piping Co., Inc., (1980) Ind.App., 409 N.E.2d 1223. We have previously granted Talas's petition, vacated the opinion of the Court of Appeals, and remanded this cause to the Industrial Board of Ind......
-
E. F. P. Corp. v. Pendill, 2-880A251
...inferences therefrom, are so conclusive as to require a contrary decision. See e. g. Talas v. Correct Piping Co., Inc. (1980) Ind.App., 409 N.E.2d 1223. (transfer A similar situation was dealt with by this court in Wolfcale v. Grush (1944) 115 Ind.App. 155, 57 N.E.2d 438. In that case, the ......
-
Talas v. Correct Piping Co., Inc., 381S52
...of Woodrow Talas, who sought review of the Court of Appeals' opinion found at Talas v. Correct Piping Co., Inc., (1980) Ind.App., 409 N.E.2d 1223. We have previously granted Talas's petition, vacated the opinion of the Court of Appeals, and twice remanded this cause to the Full Industrial B......
-
Talas v. Correct Piping Co., Inc., 381S52
...take nothing. The Court of Appeals, First District, affirmed in a unanimous opinion. Talas v. Correct Piping Co., (1980) Ind.App., 409 N.E.2d 1223. Transfer is now granted, and the decision and opinion of the Court of Appeals are hereby One issue before the Court of Appeals was whether or n......
-
Talas v. Correct Piping Co., Inc., 381S52
...of Woodrow Talas, who sought review of the Court of Appeals' opinion found at Talas v. Correct Piping Co., Inc., (1980) Ind.App., 409 N.E.2d 1223. We have previously granted Talas's petition, vacated the opinion of the Court of Appeals, and remanded this cause to the Industrial Board of Ind......
-
E. F. P. Corp. v. Pendill, 2-880A251
...inferences therefrom, are so conclusive as to require a contrary decision. See e. g. Talas v. Correct Piping Co., Inc. (1980) Ind.App., 409 N.E.2d 1223. (transfer A similar situation was dealt with by this court in Wolfcale v. Grush (1944) 115 Ind.App. 155, 57 N.E.2d 438. In that case, the ......