Talmer Bank & Trust v. Parikh

• Decision Date: 17 September 2014
• Docket Number: 313122.,Docket Nos. 149061,COA Nos. 312632,149062.
• Citation: 852 N.W.2d 896
• Parties: TALMER BANK & TRUST, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Vrajmohan C. PARIKH and Sivaji Gundlappalli, Defendants–Appellants. Talmer Bank & Trust, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Vrajmohan C. Parikh and Sivaji Gundlappalli, Defendants–Appellants.
• Court: Michigan Supreme Court

852 N.W.2d 896

TALMER BANK & TRUST, Plaintiff–Appellee,

v.Vrajmohan C. PARIKH and Sivaji Gundlappalli, Defendants–Appellants.

Talmer Bank & Trust, Plaintiff–Appellee,

v.Vrajmohan C. Parikh and Sivaji Gundlappalli, Defendants–Appellants.

Docket Nos. 149061, 149062.

COA Nos. 312632, 313122.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Sept. 17, 2014.

Prior report: 304 Mich.App. 373, 848 N.W.2d 408.

Order

On order of the Court, the motion for miscellaneous relief is GRANTED.The application for leave to appeal the February 25, 2014 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE that part of the Court of Appeals judgment that relies upon the choice-of-law standard for tort actions set forth in Sutherland v. Kennington Truck Service, Ltd.,454 Mich. 274, 562 N.W.2d 466(1997), which does not control the instant contractual dispute.In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that...