Tamiami Trail Tours, Inc. v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., Southern Greyhound Lines Division

Decision Date27 June 1968
Docket NumberNo. 1719,1719
Citation212 So.2d 365
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals
PartiesTAMIAMI TRAIL TOURS, INC., Appellant, v. GREYHOUND LINES, INC., SOUTHERN GREYHOUND LINES DIVISION, a California corporation, Appellee.

James E. Wharton and Bruce C. Starling of Akerman, Senterfitt, Eidson, Mesmer, Robbinson & Wharton, Orlando, for appellant.

John H. Wilbur and Wayne K. Ramsay of Milsam, Ramsay, Martin & Ade, Jacksonville, for appellee.

WALDEN, Chief Judge.

This is an interlocutory appeal directed toward an order granting a temporary injunction.

Plaintiff, Greyhound Lines, Inc., filed a complaint against Tamiami Trail Tours, Inc., seeking to prevent Tamiami from operating its bus service over that portion of the Sunshine State Turnpike between Fort Lauderdale and Yeehaw Junction.

Without framing the sophisticated issues that underlie, it is sufficient to note that the complaint alleged that Greyhound had certificated authority to operate over the Turnpike and that Tamiami did not; that Tamiami intended to initiate operations between West Palm Beach and Orlando over the Turnpike; and that Greyhound was thereby entitled to a temporary injunction restraining Tamiami.

After hearing, a temporary injunction was granted restraining Tamiami from use of the Turnpike between Fort Lauderdale and Yeehaw Junction. The order found that 'use of a portion of the Parkway by Tamiami will result in irreparable damage to Greyhound, for which it has no adequate remedy at law. It is obvious that the unauthorized use of a bus route by a competitor would result in irreparable damage to the authorized user.'

We hold this finding to be erroneous and therefore reverse.

The general function of a temporary injunction is to preserve the status quo until full relief can be granted following a final hearing. 1 It is conceded by Greyhound that Tamiami has operated over the Turnpike between Fort Lauderdale and Orlando for some three years. Thus, the effect of the injunction was to disturb rather than preserve the status quo.

In order to support the granting of a temporary injunction it is also necessary for plaintiff to demonstrate irreparable injury; injury which cannot be redressed in a court of law. 2 Mere loss of business because of a competitor will not suffice. 3 Any loss Greyhound might suffer as a result of Tamiami's operation over the route in question could be easily documented by ticket sales and use, and damages...

To continue reading

Request your trial
25 cases
  • 3299 N. Federal Highway, Inc. v. Board of County Com'rs of Broward County
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • September 9, 1994
    ...the fact and be fully compensated by money damages. South Florida Limousines, 512 So.2d at 1062; Tamiami Trail Tours, Inc. v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., 212 So.2d 365, 366 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968). 3299 argues in its initial brief that it offered evidence that the value of these business losses coul......
  • South Florida Limousines, Inc. v. Broward County Aviation Dept.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • September 9, 1987
    ...business because of a competitor will not suffice to demonstrate irreparable injury. Tamiami Trail Tours, Inc. v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., Southern Greyhound Lines Division, 212 So.2d 365 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968). Irreparable injury will not be found if money damages are available as a remedy. Jac......
  • Taylor v. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • November 30, 1994
    ...injunctions should not be issued where the legal rights of the parties are in substantial dispute); Tamiami Trail Tours, Inc. v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., 212 So.2d 365 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968) (to support granting of a temporary injunction, plaintiff must demonstrate irreparable injury which canno......
  • Adoption Hot Line, Inc. v. State, Dept. of Health and Rehabilitative Services, Dist. XI ex rel. Rothman
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • June 10, 1980
    ...the final hearing. 2 Uni-Chem Corporation of Florida v. Maret, 338 So.2d 885 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Tamiami Trail Tours, Inc. v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., 212 So.2d 365 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968). The controlling reason for the very existence of the power to grant a temporary injunction is that the cour......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT