Taransky v. Sec'y U.S. Dep't of Heath & Human Servs.

Docket Number13-3483
Decision Date29 July 2014
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
35 cases
  • Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Guerrera
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Connecticut
    • 13 Marzo 2018
    ...and thus precludes the program from providing such benefits when a ‘primary plan’ could be expected to pay.’ " Taransky v. Sec'y of HHS, 760 F.3d 307, 310 (3d Cir. 2014). The MSP is codified at section 1395y of title 42 of the United States Code. The MSP provides that Medicare cannot pay me......
  • Collins v. Wellcare Healthcare Plans, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Louisiana
    • 16 Diciembre 2014
    ...costs when other entities were responsible for those costs, such as private health insurance. See Taransky v. Sec'y of U.S. Dep't of Health & Human Servs., 760 F.3d 307, 309 (3d Cir.2014). In 1980, Congress altered the Medicare payment scheme in an effort to reduce escalating costs and adde......
  • Temple Univ. Hosp., Inc. v. Sec'y U.S. Dep't of Health & Human Servs.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit
    • 21 Junio 2021
    ...90 L.Ed.2d 623 (1986) (originating this exception). This lone exception is quite "narrow." Taransky v. Sec'y of the U.S. Dep't of Health & Hum. Servs. , 760 F.3d 307, 321 n.13 (3d Cir. 2014). It applies only when, "as applied generally to those covered by a particular statutory provision, h......
  • Mouradian v. U.S. Gov't
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Massachusetts
    • 30 Agosto 2018
    ...the program from providing such benefits when a 'primary plan' could be expected to pay." Taransky v. Secretary of United States Dept. of Health and Human Services, 760 F.3d 307, 310 (3rd Cir. 2014) (quoting section 1395y(b)(2)(A)). A "primary plan" encompasses "an automobile or liability i......
  • Get Started for Free
5 books & journal articles
  • § 5.9 Medicare Recovery Rights (Medicare Parts A and B)
    • United States
    • State Bar of Arizona AZ Third-Party Interests: Liens and Subrogation Rights 2019 Chapter 5 Validity and Scope of Third-Party Interests
    • Invalid date
    ...Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984). Taransky v. Sec. of U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Svcs., 760 F.3d 307, 314 n.7 (3rd Cir. 2014); Hadden v. United States, 661 F.3d 298, 308 (6th Cir. 2011); Bradley v. Sebelius, 621 F.3d 1330 (11th Cir. 2010). Th......
  • § 5.9 Medicare Recovery Rights (Medicare Parts A and B)
    • United States
    • State Bar of Arizona AZ Third-Party Interests: Liens and Subrogation Rights § 5 Validity and Scope of Third-Party Interests (§ 5.0 to § 5.20)
    • Invalid date
    ...Chevron, U.SA., Inc. v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984). Taransky v. Sec. of U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Svcs., 760 F.3d 307, 314 n.7 (3rd Cir. 2014); Hadden v. United States, 661 F.3d 298, 308 (6th Cir. 2011); Bradley v. Sebelius, 621 F.3d 1330 (11th Cir. 2010). The......
  • A. Principle 1: Preparation Is Essential for an Effective Settlement Agreement
    • United States
    • Crafting Effective Settlement Agreements: A Guidebook for Attorneys and Mediators (ABA) Chapter 2 Ten Principles for Crafting Effective Settlement Agreements
    • Invalid date
    ...Inc., 853 S.W.2d 505, 508 (Tex. 1993). 52. 42 U.S.C. § 1395y(b)(2)(A); see also Taransky v. Sec'y of U.S. Dept. of Health & Human Serv., 760 F.3d 307 (3d Cir. 2014). 53. See, e.g., Zinman v. Shalala, 835 F. Supp. 1163, 1171 (N.D. Cal. 1993) (noting that although "statute does not state that......
  • TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
    • United States
    • State Bar of Arizona AZ Third-Party Interests: Liens and Subrogation Rights Table of Authorities
    • Invalid date
    ...Taransky v. Sec. of U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Svcs., 760 F.3d 307 (3rd Cir. 2014)...................................................................................................................................66 Tetreault v. Reliance Standard Life Ins. Co, 769 F.3d 49 (1st Cir. 2014......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT