Tavora v. New York Mercantile Exchange
Decision Date | 12 December 1996 |
Docket Number | D,No. 620,620 |
Citation | 101 F.3d 907 |
Parties | 72 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 979, 69 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 44,455 Rui TAVORA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW YORK MERCANTILE EXCHANGE, Defendant-Appellee. ocket 96-7613. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit |
David M. Lira, Garden City, NY, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Martin I. Kaminsky, Pollack & Kaminsky (Justin Y.K. Chu, of counsel), New York City, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before: WINTER and WALKER, Circuit Judges, and WEXLER, District Judge. *
Rui Tavora appeals from Judge Sprizzo's order dismissing his complaint for failure to state a claim for relief. Tavora was terminated by the New York Mercantile Exchange from his position as reporter of trades when he failed to comply with its policy requiring male employees to have short hair. Tavora contends that this policy, limiting hair length for male employees but imposing no similar restriction on female employees, discriminates against male employees on the basis of gender in violation of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq. We disagree.
In Longo v. Carlisle DeCoppet & Co., we held that "requiring short hair on men and not on women does not violate Title VII," 537 F.2d 685, 685 (2d Cir.1976); see also Sietz v. O'Connor, 1995 WL 745012, * 2 (E.D.N.Y. Nov. 30, 1995). Every court of appeals that has considered this issue has agreed. See Barker v. Taft Broadcasting Co., 549 F.2d 400, 401 (6th Cir.1977); Earwood v. Continental Southeastern Lines, Inc., 539 F.2d 1349, 1351 (4th Cir.1976); Knott v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co., 527 F.2d 1249, 1252 (8th Cir.1975); Willingham v. Macon Telegraph Publ. Co., 507 F.2d 1084, 1092 (5th Cir.1975); Baker v. California Land Title Co., 507 F.2d 895, 898 (9th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 422 U.S. 1046, 95 S.Ct. 2664, 45 L.Ed.2d 699 (1975); Dodge v. Giant Food, Inc., 488 F.2d 1333, 1337 (D.C.Cir.1973).
The rationale of those decisions has generally been either that hair length policies are not within the statutory goal of equal employment, see Willingham, 507 F.2d at 1091 (), or that such employment policies have only a de minimis effect, see Dodge, 488 F.2d at 1337 ().
Tavora argues that this precedent is no longer good law in light of more recent Supreme Court decisions, in particular Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Co. v. EEOC, 462 U.S. 669, 103 S.Ct. 2622, 77 L.Ed.2d 89 (1983), and City of Los Angeles, Department of Water and Power v. Manhart, 435 U.S. 702, 98 S.Ct. 1370, 55 L.Ed.2d 657 (1978). Newport News found discriminatory a health benefits policy that provided lesser benefits for pregnancy-related services to male employees than it provided to female employees. 462 U.S. at 676, 103 S.Ct. at 2627. The Court stated, "[s]uch a practice would not pass the simple test of Title VII discrimination that we enunciated in Los Angeles Dept. of Water & Power v. Manhart, for it would treat a male employee with dependents 'in a manner which but for that person's sex would be different.' " Id. at 682-83, 103 S.Ct. at 2630-31 (citing Manhart, 435 U.S. at 711, 98 S.Ct. at 1377). Manhart held discriminatory a pension policy requiring female employees to make larger contributions than males because women's longevity was statistically greater. The Court stated, "[i]t is now well recognized that employment decisions cannot be predicated on mere 'stereotyped' impressions about the characteristics of males or females." 435 U.S. at 707, 98 S.Ct. at 1375.
Tavora contends that the "but for" test enunciated in Manhart and Newport News, combined with the Supreme Court's broad language aimed at eradicating gender-based discrimination, overrules the courts of appeals cases cited above. He argues that Title VII applies to any employment policy with any difference between men and women, no matter how trivial. We disagree with Tavora's reading of Manhart and Newport News. We believe that Tavora's...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Board of Trustees of Bastrop Independent School Dist. v. Toungate
...an employer's regulation of the hair length of males violates Title VII, all have held that it does not. See Tavora v. New York Mercantile Exch., 101 F.3d 907 (2d Cir.1996); Barker v. Taft Broad. Co., 549 F.2d 400 (6th Cir.1977); Earwood v. Continental Southeastern Lines, Inc., 539 F.2d 134......
-
Dawson v. Bumble & Bumble, 01 Civ. 8814(VM).
...Dawson has not presented sufficient evidence otherwise to support her sexual stereotyping claim. See Tavora v. New York Mercantile Exch., 101 F.3d 907, 908 (2d Cir.1996) (per curiam) (holding that a company's policies that imposed different restrictions on hair length of male employees from......
-
Zarda v. Altitude Express, Inc.
...hair on men and not on women" did not violate Title VII. 537 F.2d 685, 685 (2d Cir. 1976) ; see also Tavora v. N.Y. Mercantile Exch. , 101 F.3d 907, 908–09 (2d Cir. 1996) (same).Dress codes provide a more complicated example. It is certainly arguable that some forms of separate dress codes ......
-
Culberson v. Doan
...in a prior SEC case. 6. Note: The Second Circuit Court of Appeals declined to follow the holding of Rourke in Tavora v. New York Mercantile Exch., 101 F.3d 907, 909 (2d Cir.1996). 7. In Heyliger, the Sixth Circuit noted that there is "perennial confusion over the vocabulary and concepts of ......
-
Sex Discrimination
...and in the situation of employer vis a vis employee enjoys no constitutional protection. Id. See also Tavora v. New York Mercantile Exch., 101 F.3d 907 (2nd Cir. 1996) (finding that a policy which requires male employees to have short hair but imposes no such restrictions on female employee......
-
Sex Discrimination
...in the situation of employer vis a vis employee enjoys no constitutional protection. Id. See also Tavora v. New York Mercantile Exch. , 101 F.3d 907 (2nd Cir. 1996) (finding that a policy which requires male employees to have short hair but imposes no such restrictions on female employees d......
-
Table of cases
...v. Liner , 749 S.W.2d 251 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1988, no writ), §§29:2.B.2.a, 29:2.D.5, 29:5.D Tavora v. New York Mercantile Exch. , 101 F.3d 907 (2nd Cir. 1996), §19:5.A.3 Tayag v. Lahey Clinic Hosp., Inc., 632 F.3d 788, 792 (1st Cir. 2011), §25:3.D, 25:3.F.2 Taylor-Callahan-Coleman Count......
-
Table of cases
...v. Liner , 749 S.W.2d 251 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1988, no writ), §§29:2.B.2.a, 29:2.D.5, 29:5.D Tavora v. New York Mercantile Exch. , 101 F.3d 907 (2nd Cir. 1996), §19:5.A.3 Tayag v. Lahey Clinic Hosp., Inc., 632 F.3d 788, 792 (1st Cir. 2011), §25:3.D, 25:3.F.2 Taylor-Callahan-Coleman Count......