Tax Commission of Ohio v. Wilbur
| Decision Date | 16 May 1938 |
| Docket Number | No. 215,215 |
| Citation | Tax Commission of Ohio v. Wilbur, 304 U.S. 544, 58 S.Ct. 1036, 82 L.Ed. 1518 (1938) |
| Parties | The TAX COMMISSION OF OHIO, petitioner, v. Rollin A. WILBUR and the National City Bank of Cleveland, Ohio, Cotrustees, etc. * |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Mr. Herbert S. Duffy, of Columbus, Ohio, for petitioner.
On writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Cuyahoga County, State of Ohio.
The writ of certiorari is dismissed as it appears upon argument that the judgment sought to be reviewed rests upon a nonfederal ground adequate to support it. Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. Northern Realty Co., 244 U.S. 300, 33, 304, 37 S.Ct. 643, 61 L.Ed. 1153; Supreme Lodge, Knights of Pythias v. Meyer, 265 U.S. 30, 32, 33, 44 S.Ct. 432, 433, 68 L.Ed. 885; Lynch v. State of New York, 293 U.S. 52, 54, 55, 55 S.Ct. 16, 17, 79 L.Ed. 191.
* Rehearing denied 59 S.Ct. 65, 83 L.Ed. ——.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Rice v. Sioux City Memorial Park Cemetery
...118, 82 L.Ed. 501; Aetna Ins. Co. v. Illinois Central R. Co., 302 U.S. 652, 58 S.Ct. 269, 82 L.Ed. 505; Tax Commission of Ohio v. Wilbur, 304 U.S. 544, 58 S.Ct. 1036, 82 L.Ed. 1518; Goodman v. United States, 305 U.S. 578, 59 S.Ct. 363, 83 L.Ed. 364; Goins v. United States, 306 U.S. 622, 59 ......
-
Chemline, Inc. v. City of Grand Prairie
... ... As said by Mr. Justice Brennan in Jacobellis v. State of Ohio, 1964, 378 U.S. 184, 195, 84 S.Ct. 1676, 1682, 12 L.Ed.2d 793: ... "We recognize the legitimate ... "BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF GRAND PRAIRIE, TEXAS: ... I ... " Definitions ... ...
-
City of Baltimore v. A.S. Abell Co.
... ... 131, 166, 68 S.Ct. 915, 92 L.Ed. 1260; Trinity Methodist Church, South v. Federal Radio Commission, 61 App.D.C. 311, 62 F.2d 850; 11 Socolow, The Law of Radio Broadcasting, sec. 562, p. 1009 and ... 738, 6 L.Ed. 204, a tax imposed on the Bank by the State of Ohio was held unconstitutional as an infringement of the immunity of the Federal Government. The State ... ...
-
State of California v. Latimer, 13
...States, 282 U.S. 25, 51 S.Ct. 41, 75 L.Ed. 143; United States v. California, 297 U.S. 175, 56 S.Ct. 421, 80 L.Ed. 567. On leave granted (58 S.Ct. 1036), the State filed in this court this bill against the members of the Railroad Retirement Board and the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, ind......