Tayar v. Camelback Ski Corp., Inc.

Decision Date09 November 2010
Citation8 A.3d 299
PartiesBarbara Lichtman TAYAR, Respondent v. CAMELBACK SKI CORPORATION, INC. and Brian Monaghan, Petitioners.
CourtPennsylvania Supreme Court
ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 9th day of November, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, rephrased for clarity, are:

1. Is it against public policy for a party's exculpatory agreement to release it from liability for recklessness?
2. If it is not against public policy, how specific must the release language be to successfully release a party from recklessness?
3. Does a release from liability that mentions an employer, but does not specifically mention its employees, operate to release those employees from liability for acts committed in the course and scope of their employment?

Madame Justice ORIE MELVIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Tayar v. Camelback Ski Corp.
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Supreme Court
    • July 18, 2012
    ...policy permits releases of reckless behavior; and (3) if so, the language necessary to achieve such a release.4Tayar v. Camelback Ski Corp., Inc., 607 Pa. 460, 8 A.3d 299 (2010) (order).II. AnalysisA. Does the Release cover employees of Camelback? Appellants first argue the Superior Court e......
  • Tayar v. Camelback Ski Corp.
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Supreme Court
    • July 18, 2012
    ...policy permits releases of reckless behavior; and (3) if so, the language necessary to achieve such a release.4 Tayar v. Camelback Ski Corp., Inc., 607 Pa. 460, 8 A.3d 299 (2010) (order).II. Analysis A. Does the Release cover employees of Camelback? Appellants first argue the Superior Court......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT