Taylor v. Dunn
| Court | Texas Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | Stayton |
| Citation | Taylor v. Dunn, 16 S.W. 732 (Tex. 1891) |
| Decision Date | 05 May 1891 |
| Parties | TAYLOR v. DUNN <I>et al.</I> |
Appeal from district court, Travis county; A. L. WALKER, Sr., Judge.
Robertson & Williams and G. F. Pendexter, for appellant. J. H. Robertson and H. B. Barnhart, for appellees.
This action was brought to recover damages for an injury received by Mrs. Dunn which it may be conceded resulted from negligence of those in charge of a locomotive engaged in the transportation of material for the construction of the present state capitol. After Abner Taylor became the contractor to build the capitol, he asked permission from the city council of the city of Austin to construct a railway on and over certain streets connecting the capitol site with the railways entering the city. Such a connection by rail seems to have been almost indispensable for the transportation of material brought to the city by rail, much of which was very heavy. On January 6, 1883, an ordinance was passed giving this permission. The ordinance was as follows:
The bond executed in pursuance of this ordinance is as follows:
The cause was tried without a jury, and, with others, the court made the following findings: * * *" The fifteenth finding of fact is as follows: ...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Huston v. City of Des Moines
...bonds is in aid of injured parties, and is not a new species of legislation. Of the many cases upholding such a right see Taylor v. Dunn, 80 Tex. 652, 16 S. W. 732;Nelson Co. v. Stephenson (Tex. Civ. App.) 168 S. W. 61; Ex parte Dickey (W. Va.) 85 S. E. 781; Greene v. City, supra. Bonds hav......
-
Huston v. City of Des Moines
... ... injured parties, and is not a new species of legislation. Of ... the many cases upholding such a right, see Taylor v ... Dunn (Tex.), 80 Tex. 652, 16 S.W. 732; Nelson Co. v ... Stephenson (Tex.), 168 S.W. 61; Ex parte Dickey ... (W. Va.), 76 W.Va. 576, ... ...
-
Ex Parte Sullivan
...cause injury to another, not only is the party who thus causes injury liable, but the city is also liable. In Taylor v. Dunn, 80 Tex. 652, 667, 668, 16 S. W. 732, 737, Taylor and his associates contracted with the state to build the present capitol building. It was necessary for them to hav......
-
Freigy v. Gargaro Co.
...works a similar provision. On the contrary they should and likely will use it as a warning to be more careful with their language. In Taylor v. Dunn, supra, where a section of an somewhat more specific than the contractual provisions in the Corrigan and Riffle cases, supra, was held to be i......