Taylor v. Dwyer

Decision Date05 February 1901
Citation129 Ala. 325,29 So. 692
PartiesTAYLOR v. DWYER.
CourtAlabama Supreme Court

Appeal from city court of Montgomery; A. D. Sayre, Judge.

Action by Henrietta J. Dwyer against Frank G. Taylor. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals. Affirmed.

John G. Winter and Jack Thorington, for appellant.

De Yampert & Hausman, for appellee.

DOWDELL, J.

The action is trover. The complaint contains a single count, which is as follows: "The plaintiff claims of the defendant the sum of, to wit, twenty-five hundred dollars, in damages for the wrongful conversion by the defendant during, to wit, the years 1894 and 1895, of said amount of money intrusted to defendant by plaintiff as her agent." A judgment nil dicit was rendered, from which this appeal is prosecuted.

Whether the complaint states a substantial cause of action is practically the only question presented by the record for our consideration. The court is of the opinion, and accordingly holds, that after judgment nil dicit the complaint sufficiently states a cause of action that will support the judgment. Farrand v. Hurlburt, 7 Minn. 477 (Gil. 383); Kinaston v. Moor, Cro. Car. 89; 26 Am. & Eng. Enc. Law (1st Ed.) 766, and note. The judgment is affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Howton v. Mathias
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • 16 Noviembre 1916
    ... ... Johnson v ... McFry, 13 Ala.App. 619, 68 So. 718; Lummus Cotton ... Gin Co. v. Walker, 70 So. 754; Taylor v ... Walker, 70 So. 754; Taylor v. Dwyer, 129 Ala ... 325, 29 So. 692; Dixie F. Co. v. Teasley (App.) 69 ... The ... allegation of ... ...
  • Delmore v. Gonzales
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Civil Appeals
    • 17 Diciembre 2004
    ...was given, an action in trover may be maintained by the maker thereof for the conversion of the money paid thereon."); Taylor v. Dwyer, 129 Ala. 325, 29 So. 692 (1901) (citing with approval Farrand v. Hurlbut, 7 Minn. 477 (1862)) (holding that a conversion claim could be brought with respec......
  • Gulf Red Cedar Co. v. O'Neal
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • 6 Junio 1901
    ... ... subjected it as a whole to this ground of demurrer, which ... defect was properly taken advantage of in that way ... Taylor v. Dwyer (Ala.) 29 So. 692; Seals v ... Robinson, 75 Ala. 363 ... As we ... have seen, the bill shows that said extension agreement ... ...
  • Lewman v. Andrews
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • 5 Febrero 1901

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT