Taylor v. Samuels, 5-3255
Decision Date | 04 May 1964 |
Docket Number | No. 5-3255,5-3255 |
Citation | 238 Ark. 70,378 S.W.2d 200 |
Parties | Joe TAYLOR, Appellant, v. Alvin B. SAMUELS, Appellee. |
Court | Arkansas Supreme Court |
L. V. Rhine, Paragould, for appellant.
Kirsch, Cathey & Brown and William B. Wharton, Paragould, for appellee.
This is a suit for damages to personal property.Appellee, Alvin B. Samuel, owned a TD-9 tractor which he left parked in the country near a house occupied by Mrs. Rosa Hyde.The tractor needed repairs, and the water was drained from the radiator and cooling system.
Later, two men delivered some lumber and unloaded it near the tractor.After the lumber was unloaded, they could not get the lumber truck started; they asked Mrs. Hyde for her permission to use the tractor to pull the truck to get it started; she told them that the tractor did not belong to her, that it was being repaired and that no water was in it.Regardless of the warning given by Mrs. Hyde, the men started the tractor and used it to pull the truck.
This action was filed by appellee, owner of the tractor, who alleged that the appellant, Taylor, his agents and employees, wrongfully and without permission used the tractor when the cooling system contained no water and as a result thereof the tractor was damaged in the sum of $713.39.There was a judgment for Samuel in the amount of $713.00, and Taylor, the defendant, has appealed.
There is substantial evidence that the two men who delivered the lumber used the tractor and damaged it in the stated amount.On the question of agency, Mrs. Hyde was permitted to testify that the men who delivered the lumber...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Farmers Equipment Co. v. Miller
...with a price, but I am not sure about that.' We find no similarity between this testimony and that held inadmissible in Taylor v. Samuel, 238 Ark. 70, 378 S.W.2d 200, relied upon by appellant. There, an attempt was made to prove the agency of two unidentified individuals making delivery of ......
- Ball v. Spencer
-
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. v. Beadles, Inc.
...it is the only proof of an essential element of a claim. Eichelberger v. State, 323 Ark. 551, 916 S.W.2d 109 (1996); Taylor v. Samuels, 238 Ark. 70, 378 S.W.2d 200 (1964). As such, the trial court improperly admitted the memo and the testimony regarding Wayne Jr.'s telephone Finally, we do ......