Taylor v. Shoemaker, 4 Div. 528.
| Citation | 251 Ala. 601,38 So.2d 900 |
| Decision Date | 17 February 1949 |
| Docket Number | 4 Div. 528. |
| Parties | Robert TAYLOR v. H. T. SHOEMAKER. |
| Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Certiorari to Court of Appeals.
L. A. Farmer, of Dothan, for petitioner.
Carl S. Farmer, of Abbeville, and G. D. Halstead, of Headland, opposed.
Petition of Robert Taylor for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that Court in the case of Taylor v. Shoemaker, 38 So.2d 895.
Writ denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial
7 cases
-
First Alabama Bank of Huntsville, N.A. v. Spragins
...v. Alabama Power Company, 401 So.2d 107 (Ala.1981); Taylor v. Shoemaker, 34 Ala.App. 168, 38 So.2d 895 (1948), cert. denied, 251 Ala. 601, 38 So.2d 900 (1949). The Spraginses argue that the court correctly determined the amount of the loss by weighing the actual value of the trust principal......
-
Wray v. Harris
...212 Ala. 60, 62, 101 So. 763, 765 (1924); Taylor v. Shoemaker, 34 Ala.App. 168, 172, 38 So.2d 895, 899 (1948), cert. denied, 251 Ala. 601, 38 So.2d 900 (1949). The issue of damages is remanded to the trial court with instructions to mold a decree "to protect the rights of all parties and do......
-
Ex parte Wilson
...nothing by appeal from a judgment or order rendered at his request. Taylor v. Shoemaker, 34 Ala.App. 168, 38 So.2d 895, cert. den. 251 Ala. 601, 38 So.2d 900. As was said by Brickell, C. J., in McNeil v. State of Alabama; Skiner v. State of Alabama, 71 Ala. '* * * Consent removes or obviate......
-
State ex rel. Patterson v. O'Dell
...no appellate jurisdiction in cases involving injunctions. See Taylor v. Shoemaker, 34 Ala.App. 168, 38 So.2d 895, certiorari denied 251 Ala. 601, 38 So.2d 900. Since the Court of Appeals does not have appellate jurisdiction in injunction matters, the provisions of § 89, Title 13, supra, can......
Request a trial to view additional results