Taylor v. Squier, Misc. 177.
| Decision Date | 21 June 1950 |
| Docket Number | No. Misc. 177.,Misc. 177. |
| Citation | 183 F.2d 67 |
| Parties | TAYLOR v. SQUIER et al. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Earl W. Taylor, in pro per.
No other appearances were entered.
Before DENMAN, Chief Judge, and MATHEWS and HEALY, Circuit Judges.
Congress has not given to a federal court of appeals jurisdiction to consider an application for a writ of habeas corpus. 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241. Nor has it given that court the power to allow appeals from judgments denying an application for a writ of habeas corpus. Such appeals are taken by filing a notice of appeal in the district court in which the adverse judgment is rendered. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 73(a).
The application for the writ of habeas corpus is dismissed. The petition to allow an appeal is also dismissed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Anderson v. Jones
...County, Ohio, 6 Cir., 269 F.2d 838; Meek v. State of California, 9 Cir., 220 F.2d 348; Posey v. Dowd, 7 Cir., 134 F.2d 613; Taylor v. Squier, 9 Cir., 183 F.2d 67. Since our jurisdiction is appellate in nature, we are limited to a review of the record before the District Court. We are withou......
-
Trivette v. New York Life Insurance Company
...grant an appeal from a judgment of the District Court or to amend the notice of appeal. Rule 73(a), Rules of Civil Procedure; Taylor v. Squier, 9 Cir., 183 F.2d 67; Donovan v. Esso Shipping Co., 3 Cir., 259 F.2d 65, 68; Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. Epperson, 8 Cir., 240 F.2d 189, 192. Wh......
- BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE F. & E. v. United States
-
Loum v. Alvis
...Title 28, U.S.Code; Posey v. Dowd, 7 Cir., 134 F.2d 613, certiorari denied, 319 U.S. 746, 63 S.Ct. 1032, 87 L.Ed. 1701; Taylor v. Squier, 9 Cir., 183 F.2d 67. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the application for writ of habeas corpus are ...