Teague v. United States, 16270.

Decision Date27 July 1959
Docket NumberNo. 16270.,16270.
Citation268 F.2d 925
PartiesEdgar Harold TEAGUE, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit

Roos, Jennings & Haid, Leslie L. Roos, John Victor Tilly, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

Lynn J. Gillard, U. S. Atty., Bernard Petrie, Asst. U. S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Before STEPHENS, HAMLEY, and JERTBERG, Circuit Judges.

HAMLEY, Circuit Judge.

Edgar Harold Teague appeals from his conviction and sentence on a charge of stealing goods which had been placed on a wharf as part of a foreign shipment.1 Two questions are presented here. The first is whether the trial court committed reversible error in receiving in evidence a Japanese weighmaster's certificate. The second is whether the court erred in denying Teague's motion for judgment of acquittal.2

Teague was convicted of stealing five coils of used copper wire. Early in 1957, Federated Metals Company of San Francisco sold 186 coils of used copper wire to a broker in New York. The broker in turn sold the wire to the Tatsuta Industrial Company in Japan. On March 6, 1957, Federated Metals sent the 186 coils by truck to pier 50 of the American President Lines in San Francisco. Each coil had attached to it a shipping tag showing the destination as Kobe, Japan.

Presumably the entire 186 coils were loaded aboard the SS. President Taylor on March 8, 1957. However, the coils were not counted individually during loading. That vessel sailed for Japan on the following day. On March 7, 1957, however, five coils resembling those shipped were found in Teague's station wagon outside the Richmond Iron and Metal Company yard in nearby Richmond, California. A tag marked "FH 3916, Kobe, No. 174," was found with these five coils and was identified as the tag which had been affixed to the one hundred seventy-fourth coil in the shipment.

Teague was employed as a painter leaderman by American President Lines. On March 6, 1957, he parked his car near the place on the pier where the coils were stored and reported for work. He testified that as he drove home from work that day he found the five coils lying in the roadway at the intersection of two streets a few blocks from pier 50. It was his testimony that he placed the wire in his car with the possible intention of selling it. On the following day, and at Teague's direction, Teague's stepson took the five coils to the Richmond Iron and Metal Company to obtain a price. It was here that the five coils were discovered by a police officer.

Upon request of American President Lines, the coils of wire aboard the President Taylor were counted at Yokohama. Only 181 coils were found. However, a subsequent check at Kobe showed a total of 186 coils were then aboard the vessel.

It is the Government's theory that some confederate of Teague's must have made little coils out of big coils during the ship's passage from Yokohama to Kobe. In support of this view, the Government introduced evidence pertaining to the weight of the wire. This evidence tended to show that the total shipment weighed 22,000 pounds when it left Federated Metals and that it weighed 21,501 pounds when it reached Kobe. The five coils found in Teague's station wagon weighed about 500 pounds.

The only evidence of the weight of the wire when it reached Kobe was a Japanese weighmaster's certificate. This paper was offered and received in evidence as a business record, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A., § 1732. During oral argument before this court, however, counsel for the Government conceded, with commendable frankness, that the certificate was not admissible as a business record.

It is argued, however, that the certificate was nevertheless admissible under the doctrine of curative admissibility. Under this doctrine, as...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • U.S. v. Hearst
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • November 2, 1977
    ...to the testimony of appellant's experts. Cf. McCormick on Evidence § 57, at p. 132-33 (2d ed. Cleary 1972); Teague v. United States, 268 F.2d 925, 927 (9th Cir. 1959); Meyers v. United States, 147 F.2d 663, 667 (9th Cir. 1945). Five days after sentencing, appellant filed a motion for new tr......
  • Swayze v. U.S.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • July 11, 1991
    ...result. See United States v. Whitworth, 856 F.2d 1268, 1285 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1084 (1989); Teague v. United States, 268 F.2d 925, 927 (9th Cir.1959). The "opening the door" rule, sometimes referred to as the "invited error" doctrine, provides that a party may present ot......
  • OIL CHEMICAL & ATOM. WKRS. INT. UNION v. Delta Refin. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit
    • March 23, 1960
    ...consideration of other questions relating to the validity of the award including "the scope of the grievances submitted to arbitration." 268 F.2d 925. This suggests that if the award covered grievances not set forth in the agreement it need not be enforced. That court proceeded to make this......
  • Lee v. Olin Mathieson Chemical Corporation
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Virginia
    • July 28, 1967
    ... ... Civ. A. No. 66-C-32-R ... United States District Court W. D. Virginia, Abingdon Division ... July 28, ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT